Radio Show Hour 1 – 02/09/2024

[00:00:00] [MUSIC]

[00:00:12] Broadcasting live from atop the Rocky Mountains, the crossroads of the West.

[00:00:18] You are listening to the Liberty Roundtable Radio Ta-Cho.

[00:00:23] >> All right, happy to have you along my fellow Americans, Sam Bushman live on your radio.

[00:00:28] Hard hitting news that I refuse to use, no doubt starts now.

[00:00:32] This my fellow Americans is the broadcast for February the 9th and

[00:00:35] the year of our Lord 2024.

[00:00:37] This is our one of two in the goal always to protect life, liberty and property.

[00:00:42] To promote God, family and country and to do so on your radio and

[00:00:44] the traditions of our founding fathers.

[00:00:47] We reject revolution unless it's a Jesus revolution then we're in.

[00:00:50] We celebrate the checks and balances brilliantly put in place by the founding

[00:00:53] fathers and one of the peaceful restorative solutions we have at our fingertips as

[00:00:57] we promote the supreme law of the land, the constitution of the United States of America.

[00:01:01] The checks and balances are brilliant folks.

[00:01:03] Welcome to the show.

[00:01:04] Dr. Scott Bradley is with me.

[00:01:05] Welcome, sir.

[00:01:06] >> Well, good morning, Sam.

[00:01:09] Good morning to all the listeners.

[00:01:10] We hope all as well with you on this Friday morning.

[00:01:14] By the way, I think our last get together, we talked about Groundhog Day and

[00:01:19] about the inability of the prognosticators in science to be able to even tell from

[00:01:25] the day to day almost, in many instances, their percentages are fairly low.

[00:01:29] We talked about that.

[00:01:31] People recall, well, we got nailed this morning with a winter wonderland snow storm.

[00:01:37] Totally, totally, totally, surprise, surprise, you know, kind of thing.

[00:01:44] It's the new baby that's born 15 years after your last child, you know?

[00:01:47] Anyway.

[00:01:48] >> Yeah, it's never a surprise to me though, when, you know,

[00:01:50] when we're in, you know, February, March, April, you know,

[00:01:53] it doesn't surprise me that a snow storm happens.

[00:01:56] >> No, it doesn't.

[00:01:56] It shouldn't, but.

[00:01:58] >> Right.

[00:01:58] >> But it was just absolutely bizarre as the snow plows were moving last time,

[00:02:02] I'm going, holy cow, they all week long, totally clear.

[00:02:06] If there's not been even precipitation, you know, any kind.

[00:02:09] >> Then it just, boom, it nailed us.

[00:02:12] >> Yeah, it makes you wonder if they're bringing them in on purpose.

[00:02:14] >> Well, God must be.

[00:02:17] I don't know as we really have that capability now unless you're talking about

[00:02:21] some of the harp things and some of these.

[00:02:24] >> Yeah, I know, you know, efforts.

[00:02:25] Any, I know, I'm distracting this morning, but it was just this morning,

[00:02:29] it was like, man, everything was supposed to be, you know, kind of a,

[00:02:34] maybe not spring day, but at least totally without any precipitation.

[00:02:39] And boom, here we are, we're going to be shoveling out for a long time today.

[00:02:43] So what's going on in your world?

[00:02:45] >> You got that right.

[00:02:46] There's a lot going on, sir.

[00:02:48] >> My headline says this, Biden is above the law.

[00:02:53] There's no other way to slice it, no other way to call it.

[00:02:55] Biden is literally above the law.

[00:02:58] And it also then now proves over time that Barack Obama was above the law.

[00:03:02] And Bill and Hillary Clinton are above the law.

[00:03:06] We see this day in and day out and it doesn't end now.

[00:03:09] Listen, outlets including the Washington Post now are confirming,

[00:03:14] reports that Joe Biden will face criticism but not face charges in the special

[00:03:22] counsel and investigation into his handling of classified documents.

[00:03:26] The conclusion is that the improper handling of classified documents was more

[00:03:32] likely a mistake than a criminal act.

[00:03:34] There you have it.

[00:03:36] But the bottom line is the same reality check not afforded to President Trump,

[00:03:39] even though President Trump might have the right to classify documents.

[00:03:42] The Senator Joe Biden and the Vice President Joe Biden never did, but

[00:03:47] yet they're giving him a pass anyway.

[00:03:50] And they're basically describing it as well meaning elderly man with a poor memory.

[00:03:57] Joe Biden literally forgot when his term of vice president was.

[00:04:02] He forgot when his son Bo died.

[00:04:06] Biden told a crowd of donors just recently in New York that he recently spoke to

[00:04:10] German Chancellor Helmut Kohl has been dead for seven years.

[00:04:15] Biden made a similar mistake when he said that he met with the French president as

[00:04:20] well, who has been dead for almost three decades.

[00:04:24] Biden mixed up two foreign presidents and forgot the name of a parish during

[00:04:30] his press conference that he insisted on to defend his memory.

[00:04:34] Joe Biden gave a quote, rare and unexpected press conference Thursday night in

[00:04:40] which he blamed it all on his staff for mishandling classified documents.

[00:04:46] And he snapped that reporters who asked questions.

[00:04:49] Now there's a call by the way to invoke the 25th amendment against Joe Biden on

[00:04:56] social media.

[00:04:58] And anyway, it goes on and on and on.

[00:05:00] We'll talk about more of the details in a second, but doctor, I just want to get your

[00:05:02] take here.

[00:05:04] Bottom line is Joe's above the law.

[00:05:05] It's really the bottom line of this whole thing.

[00:05:09] Well, Sam, you've done a pretty good recap of another day in the life of Joe Biden.

[00:05:14] I mean, I, I think that this is probably more than norm than the extraordinary.

[00:05:22] You know, we've got this front page headline news about he's not going to be

[00:05:27] prosecuted.

[00:05:28] Yeah.

[00:05:29] Yeah, we could have predicted that.

[00:05:30] It's front page headline news.

[00:05:31] Every front page headline noon, a daughtering old man that just was, and all of these

[00:05:37] faux pas that are happening is just, but I, you know, I'm not really encouraged by applying

[00:05:44] the 25th amendment.

[00:05:45] I mean, look who's in line.

[00:05:47] Oh, baby, where is she?

[00:05:49] I mean, has anybody done a cognitive review of her?

[00:05:53] I mean, good, gracious.

[00:05:54] I mean, Kamala Harris is, is not what you'd call, you know, the stellar performer of any,

[00:06:00] any assignments he's ever had, except for maybe as a party girl, I don't know.

[00:06:04] But the fact of the matter is, I, we're indeed due to my friend and, and by the way, I just,

[00:06:12] I'm just in a broad position and I have to pick up the ball on this thing.

[00:06:14] But if you didn't watch the, the Tucker Carlson Putin review, I did.

[00:06:18] We'll get into that too.

[00:06:20] Dr. Bradley is great.

[00:06:21] The problem is he, he mixes so many topics together.

[00:06:24] It's hard to focus.

[00:06:25] Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, the pot called him the Kels Black Sam.

[00:06:28] I mean, come on.

[00:06:30] I mean, no, no, really, really, this is, this is, yeah, we'll get into that as the broadcast

[00:06:35] unfolds.

[00:06:36] So stick with this first issue here because I'm going to tie this together and I think

[00:06:39] a meaningful way.

[00:06:41] Biden is above the law.

[00:06:44] He'll face criticism, but not criminal charges.

[00:06:47] The conclusion is that the improper handling of the classified documents is more likely

[00:06:52] a mistake than a criminal act.

[00:06:54] That's what they're coming out saying.

[00:06:55] And this is typical, these people are all above the law every time they come back and

[00:06:59] say, you know, it wasn't good.

[00:07:00] It was a misstep.

[00:07:01] There's no criminal activity here.

[00:07:03] Move along.

[00:07:04] And that's what we saw with Bill and Hillary.

[00:07:06] That's what we saw with Barack Obama and the, and the fortished versus bigot.

[00:07:09] Now we're seeing this with Joe Biden, but we've gone to a different level though.

[00:07:13] One group means harm, the Clintons and the Bidens and you know, Joe probably means harm,

[00:07:19] hard to tell, but he's so derelict in his duty, he doesn't know what's going on to the point

[00:07:23] where to me, this is just a serious national security concern.

[00:07:26] And when we get to the Russian discussion with Vladimir Putin and Tucker Carlson, it'll

[00:07:32] just highlight the national security concern we have at our hand doctor.

[00:07:35] This isn't attack Joe because he's not, you know, sharp as attack and spry and all that.

[00:07:41] This is not an attack on an old man.

[00:07:43] Okay, this is a reality check about national security is what I want to get to.

[00:07:48] But when we get to the Russian discussion, it highlights the point like no other.

[00:07:54] Dr.

[00:07:55] There's no question.

[00:07:56] I mean, Joe Biden, I believe it's elder abuse.

[00:07:58] I mean, I'm, I'm sorry.

[00:08:00] I mean, there's all my sympathies.

[00:08:02] Couldn't agree more that is just fading into the, into the wallpaper.

[00:08:07] It's absolutely shocking to me.

[00:08:09] And you know, the, they're insistent and making him the, the suicidal candidate for, I mean,

[00:08:17] he's not on his toes enough to figure out how to take too many pills to end it.

[00:08:22] I don't know.

[00:08:23] I mean, you know, I'm, I'm using figurative words in terms of his, of his campaign for

[00:08:27] presidency.

[00:08:28] But, but look, they seem to be stuck with Kamala too.

[00:08:31] I mean, it's like, Oh yeah, we're here's a, how are you going to get rid of Kamala though.

[00:08:35] The second you decide to get rid of Kamala, you hate women and you hate blacks, right?

[00:08:38] Even though she's not black.

[00:08:39] Yeah, that's right.

[00:08:40] I mean here, this is everything is a, I identify, I identify as a multi millionaire, but that

[00:08:46] doesn't help my bank account.

[00:08:48] Yeah.

[00:08:49] You know, I mean, come on.

[00:08:50] Yeah, she's not really black Kamala.

[00:08:51] Is she?

[00:08:52] No, no.

[00:08:53] She's, she's a split.

[00:08:54] She's got, you know, Indian and, and Jamaican.

[00:08:57] Yeah.

[00:08:58] So, so anyway, I, but she is colored though, right?

[00:09:03] Yeah.

[00:09:04] You know, is that it?

[00:09:05] Is that an appropriate term, Sam?

[00:09:06] I don't know.

[00:09:07] No, absolutely not.

[00:09:09] NAACP National Advanced, you know, Association of Advancement.

[00:09:12] Color people.

[00:09:13] So they're advancing her.

[00:09:14] Yeah.

[00:09:15] At any rate, I just find it absolutely astounding.

[00:09:19] And, and here we have the guy supposed to be the re, leader of the free world and then

[00:09:26] he can't probably find his way to the restroom most of the time, you know?

[00:09:30] And, and so it's just confusion.

[00:09:33] Confusion.

[00:09:34] Yeah.

[00:09:35] I mean, you talk about talking about different leaders that have been dead for extended periods

[00:09:39] of time that he just met with.

[00:09:41] I mean, maybe he sees dead people.

[00:09:43] I don't know.

[00:09:44] But sometimes that's maybe a sign that you're kind of transitioning to the other side.

[00:09:50] I don't know.

[00:09:51] But, but they say it's also a sign of dementia and all those kinds of things, but somebody's

[00:09:57] got to do an assessment, but, but I don't think we got a good option up our sleeve.

[00:10:01] I mean, well, other than let's do an impeachment and remove him and Kamala, then maybe there's

[00:10:07] another one, but, but I'm not that impressed with Mike.

[00:10:10] I mean, there's been so many screw-ups in so many ways.

[00:10:14] No, Mike has been an absolute disappointment.

[00:10:18] Absolutely.

[00:10:20] So it's like, holy cow, then where do we go?

[00:10:22] Oh, oh, we got Schumer, Chucky baby.

[00:10:27] Well, and how did Mike, how did Mike and crew, by the way, let go ahead and skip the break,

[00:10:33] how did Mike and crew literally sit back in the house, knowing full well, they're supposed

[00:10:36] to originate all spending bills, let the Senate go to town on supposedly immigration

[00:10:40] or the border reform or whatever you want to call it, mixing it with somehow the Ukraine

[00:10:45] in some weird way, waiting for the Senate to unveil the spending bill, and then they

[00:10:49] look at it and go, it's D.O.A.

[00:10:51] What have they been doing for the last many, many, many weeks, while they know full well

[00:10:54] that their authority in the house to originate spending bills, their responsibility, their

[00:11:00] duty was being, you know, replaced by the Senate.

[00:11:03] Why didn't we hear anything from Mike while this was going on, like, hey, how dare you

[00:11:06] guys?

[00:11:07] I don't know why you're working on a bill.

[00:11:08] I don't think you are, but you don't have, you know, origination of spending bills authority.

[00:11:12] This is our responsibility.

[00:11:13] We're putting together, not only did they, were they derelict in their duties, sitting

[00:11:16] by a wall, or this happened, and then let it released and said it was dead on arrival.

[00:11:20] They did nothing to put their own plan in place either.

[00:11:24] So true.

[00:11:25] Everything you're stating is absolutely correct, but, but, but Rand Paul has speculated.

[00:11:30] I don't know if it's speculation or he had, he was a fly in the wall or heard the rumor

[00:11:34] or put two and two together.

[00:11:37] But he says the reason the bill was advanced by Schumer and Mitch is because they're traveling

[00:11:43] to Ukraine to meet Ukraine president later this month.

[00:11:47] If they want to go dance in the street with him about this big thing.

[00:11:50] So they can go hang out the Ukrainians, but Tucker can't hang out with Vladimir?

[00:11:54] No.

[00:11:55] Yeah, you're right.

[00:11:56] Here's the deal.

[00:11:57] Tucker broke stuff that the, there should have been major, major government agencies clamoring

[00:12:06] to have some kind of face to face with the senior guy in Russia to make certain that

[00:12:13] they could get to the bottom of this and, and Putin offered, I mean, well, he, he reminded

[00:12:19] everybody, I guess I should say, that he has been offering for the last 18 months to meet

[00:12:25] at the table and solve this problem over there.

[00:12:28] And how they've had multiple accords that have been torn off, you know, Boris Johnson tore

[00:12:33] up the one, well, they, the Ukrainians tore it up at the behest of Boris Johnson out of

[00:12:38] England.

[00:12:39] But they've had multiple solutions that have been brought forth, negotiated solutions,

[00:12:44] solutions that the people were interested in, Zelensky, for example, the guy that's

[00:12:48] the head of Ukraine, he was elected on a peace platform when he got elected.

[00:12:54] But, but we have been insisting that they stay at war.

[00:12:58] And by the way, we did the coup in 2014. And I mean, that we have advanced NATO every single

[00:13:04] one of these things that are happening, we can lay at the doorstep of the U.S. government.

[00:13:09] And, and so, as, and Tucker, you know, I mean, I could, I can throw criticism and I can throw

[00:13:16] accolades, but, but he had some groundbreaking reviews there.

[00:13:23] The conversation had to happen. And Americans needed to see that, Sam, I've been a reminder,

[00:13:30] we've been saying this since the start of the war. I mean, the stuff that Putin brought

[00:13:35] out was, yeah, I said that, yeah, I said that, yeah, I said that, the stuff that's

[00:13:39] being reviewed. Here's what I told people when the question

[00:13:42] On my webinar last night I said the first thing you've got to do is go read not read

[00:13:48] watch the Tucker Carlson interview with Bobby Kennedy Jr. Go watch that you'll have some

[00:13:57] imprints in your mind with different concepts and then go watch the Vladimir Putin review.

[00:14:04] Bobby Kennedy is the most cogent individual on this topic that's in a high profile position

[00:14:10] running for something office nowadays. You know, Rand Paul and his dad do a pretty good

[00:14:17] job on a lot of these things too. But the Bobby Kennedy thing was truly an insightful

[00:14:23] incisive review of what brought us to this point in Ukraine and Putin confirmed it all.

[00:14:33] And you say, oh Bobby Kennedy's in hoo hoo. I would say he didn't he didn't more than

[00:14:37] confirm it all in my opinion. Yeah, absolutely because he made some real statements that we

[00:14:44] need to drive to ground and if true, Joe Biden's a war criminal. Not only that, but the State

[00:14:52] Department. I mean, the the Nate told the, I mean, all of the European Union stuff. I

[00:14:57] mean, this is disaster unraveling. And Putin was very decisive. He said some things that

[00:15:05] told me that he has a better grasp on us politics, us economy, global politics than anybody in

[00:15:16] the lame brain mainstream press in America. We're doing this by exclusion. We're not talking

[00:15:21] about it. Some sins of omission, if you will. But but Putin, he understands the shift. It's

[00:15:29] a major shift in the economics of the world, the bricks thing and and the the pushing together

[00:15:35] of China and Russia. Russia's now the premier economy in Europe. It is. It holds premier

[00:15:43] position based upon its trade levels, its its revenue streams, all those kinds of things.

[00:15:48] And and what has happened is all of these, oh, I don't know, we're gonna we're gonna run

[00:15:53] a blockade on Russia. Oh, yeah, right. And the the Europeans are are sucking air. They're

[00:16:00] trying to breathe through a straw with their head underwater right now. They got problems

[00:16:04] of energy and problems of their economy, right? Oh, then, I mean, well, I know I'm jumping

[00:16:09] all over. These are related energy and economy. And they are the Nord Stream thing then and

[00:16:15] he says, and Tucker says, well, who did it? He says, Tucker, I mean, didn't quite say

[00:16:20] it that way. I said a little stronger. Pretty much there's a translator there. So it's

[00:16:24] not perfect. But he virtually said what you're saying, he said, have you lost? Come on now.

[00:16:28] We all know the truth around the world except for you guys internally, the United States,

[00:16:32] he virtually said that it was almost a slap. Well, it was and then he said, who has motivation

[00:16:40] and who has the skillset? And who already went on record saying that they would do it.

[00:16:45] They promised they could get it done. It will be done. Remember, I had the sound bite of

[00:16:50] that where Joe literally said, and she was astounded the reporter going, what, how? And

[00:16:54] he's like, don't worry about how, but I'm promising you it's going to happen. Well, when

[00:16:58] you have that on record, that's enough for prosecution. That's literally telling what

[00:17:02] you're going to do before you do it and then doing it and then pretending, Oh, I'm not involved.

[00:17:07] I had nothing to do with it. Well, how's that going to work? We had we had we had motivation,

[00:17:12] we had opportunity, and we had the skillset. Very, very they have to be state actors to

[00:17:18] do what happened on that Nord Stream bombing. And it was I mean, unbelievable. And here's

[00:17:26] Putin. He's toying in a way with Tucker. I mean, he's being coy. Yeah. And it's so astonishing

[00:17:35] to me. Tucker didn't pick up the baton on some things. I mean, I'm quite confident that

[00:17:40] Tucker came into the interview with some preconceived questions. I mean, he would have been

[00:17:44] foolish not to in case it lagged. But but really Putin, he gave him a history lesson and

[00:17:51] Tucker at the beginning of the thing to his credit, he says, you know what? We thought

[00:17:54] this was a filibuster thing of the first half hour, but it was really cogent review to bring

[00:18:00] us to our current situation. Well, and I'm not here to defend Vladimir on everything,

[00:18:06] but I am here to say he did give you the other side of the story that you may not know

[00:18:10] from a Russian perspective. He has every right to articulate that every right to lay things

[00:18:14] out as they see their side of the story. And so I know it took Vladimir quite some time.

[00:18:20] And I think he should have summarized the history a little bit like he threw out a lot

[00:18:24] of old base. They're really hard to track for the average American people and stuff.

[00:18:28] Where I think that Tucker I think Tucker for the most part did a pretty good job. And it's

[00:18:32] to his credit, the admitted that it was not a filler bluster attempt by the Russian president.

[00:18:36] And to me, the issue is he went on way too long, the Russian president about the history.

[00:18:41] And Tucker lost control of the interview, in my opinion, when they started out, basically

[00:18:46] Tucker starts out and then he goes on and then Tucker interrupts him a couple of times,

[00:18:50] these kind of annoyed. And then he basically stops and the Russian president said, look,

[00:18:53] is this a talk show? Like, is this just for ratings for you, Tucker? Or is this a real

[00:18:59] conversation? And Tucker said, oh, it's a conversation. Well, that's when Tucker lost

[00:19:03] control of the interview. Yeah, he did. Okay. And in my opinion, the key is what you say

[00:19:07] is it's both, sir. It is a talk show because this is going to the whole nation, the United

[00:19:11] States. So you know what, I appreciate the history lesson, because I'm a history buff

[00:19:14] as Tucker Carlson, but the average American is not and you're going to lose so much of

[00:19:18] my audience. I'm not telling you not to review the history. I'm telling you, you've got to

[00:19:23] make it short and cogent into the point where you can catch the American people up in a

[00:19:27] way that they can understand that if you talk about eight, you know, 800, whatever, you know,

[00:19:33] 1200 years ago in the Middle Ages, okay, you're you're going to you're going to lose everyone.

[00:19:39] You've got to functionally bring it to the, so I think that he could have taken control

[00:19:43] of the interview and said, listen, it's both. And here's what it is. It's not a ratings

[00:19:46] game. It's not a talk show like a joke, like a reality TV show. It's not that. But it is

[00:19:52] a summary to the American people though. It's not a three hour history lesson for Tucker.

[00:19:56] Let's say, get the American people up to speed. And I think it was a missed opportunity by

[00:20:00] both of them. The president met well, but he went on way too long and he lost everybody

[00:20:04] for the most part of them. And I literally listened to it in a half hour and I was going,

[00:20:07] okay, well, where's the meat of this thing? So I think it kind of backfired on Tucker

[00:20:12] and I think he lost control of the interviews. What I think happened. And I think he got

[00:20:16] kind of spanked and schooled by the Russian president a little bit too, along the way.

[00:20:19] Yep. But I'll tell you what, it was a good dynamic though, honestly. For me, I saw that

[00:20:25] and I said, okay, okay, okay, let's collate that into whatever. And they've circled the

[00:20:29] wagons came back around. Here's the here's a, I mean, I'm going to try and net out a few

[00:20:34] things. I think number one, I think Putin is a far better Russian than Biden is an American.

[00:20:42] That sad, but factual agreed. It's a sad indictment. I think he's a he has a higher

[00:20:47] religiosity than Biden does. And well, he did highlight the crate. He did make a point

[00:20:53] in his big, long history to highlight the Christianity reality check of how, you know,

[00:20:58] what Russian, Christianity is a real thing. It's not just a theory or we're doing it

[00:21:03] just so you don't believe we're communists or whatever else. There is a true Christian

[00:21:06] element there that matters. I think that, and I can't completely temper this with facts

[00:21:13] at this point. So it'll be speculation on my part. I'll admit that upfront. But by and

[00:21:19] so I think that there's a far greater, far greater religiosity that is kind of bubbling

[00:21:25] just underneath the surface in Russia for the common folk than certainly there is that's

[00:21:32] being presented in the, in the major media. Now, okay, when I say that, you have to understand

[00:21:37] I've crossed this country so many times and boots on the ground everywhere. I believe

[00:21:43] that there's a hardcore rock ribbed Christian element in the United States. I really do.

[00:21:49] And I've known many of those people been on their farms helping them work and all that

[00:21:52] kind of stuff, helping to build churches, stuff like that as I've crisscrossed the America.

[00:21:58] But but I'm here to tell you that what's presented in the media is such left wing upside

[00:22:04] down backwards, drivel about this humanist world that everything's become woke and trans

[00:22:11] and made up sexual status and all this kind of stuff that a lot of Americans believe that

[00:22:15] is what America is. I think Putin was trying to say, look, you got a highly religious people

[00:22:22] in Russia, a people that that has been through the hard knocks 80 years of hell on earth with

[00:22:30] the communist effort to destroy the opium of the masses, if you will. But people retained

[00:22:35] their religiosity. I could tell you personal experiences with people that I've had, Russians

[00:22:41] that were closet Christians, if you will, people that would die for the Savior's name.

[00:22:48] And the fact of the matter is that Americans don't have a clue that there's another Christian

[00:22:53] nation over there. And and you know, it's not like, you know, you say, I mean, a lot

[00:22:58] of what Putin said, I'll have to say this too, was colored in the lens of his history, his

[00:23:06] personal life's history. And so some of that, some of that came out to me as I'm, I try

[00:23:12] to, I read the nuances, I watched his feet. This is a strange thing, Sam. I watched his

[00:23:18] feet while he was on camera and he had a full body shot on it. And there's some interesting

[00:23:23] body language going on there. And so there's, and though his demeanor while he's sitting

[00:23:28] and talking, and I mean, it was, to me, it was a like revelatory kind of experience and

[00:23:35] watching a man that Americans never have had a pulse of. And Tucker did that, and that

[00:23:41] should be a major thing. Tucker's effort to get a journal is released. Putin came back

[00:23:48] with some, the other side of the story kind of stuff. You know, I think about Tucker saying,

[00:23:55] now I'm not saying this kid that's over there is guilty of anything. But Tucker says he's

[00:24:00] just a kid. He's not a spy. You know what? I think about when I was 18, 19, 20 years

[00:24:05] old, if I was working for my country, a lot of strange things happens when you're 18,

[00:24:10] 19, 20 years old, you know, I mean, so, you know, there was a different, there was an

[00:24:16] interesting exchange and dynamic. I think it had to happen. And people were saying he

[00:24:20] ought to be treated like a son. He ought to be imprisoned. Revolt your off. Your everybody

[00:24:26] who claims that is absolutely off their rock. Crazy ladies and gentlemen, he might have just

[00:24:31] started a peaceful solution. Hang tight. Dr. Scott Bradley, freedom is rising sudden.com

[00:24:38] continues on your radio.

[00:24:52] Your daily Liberty News wire. You're listening to Liberty News radio.

[00:25:01] USA News. I'm Ryan Daniels. In the chambers of the US Supreme Court, former president

[00:25:08] Trump's attorneys argue there was never an insurrection against the US government.

[00:25:13] President Trump did not engage in any act that can plausibly be characterized as a

[00:25:18] surrender. Furthermore, they argue the Civil War era clause of the 14th Amendment being

[00:25:21] used against Trump in many states does not apply to presidents only lower officeholders.

[00:25:28] The case stems from a Colorado High Court decision to remove Trump from that state's

[00:25:32] primary ballots over his actions related to the January 6th US Capitol riots. A US House

[00:25:38] select committee that investigated two years ago termed it as an attempted coup at the

[00:25:43] time. Former president Trump notching a victory in the Republican caucuses in the US Virgin

[00:25:48] Islands. Trump's already won caucuses in primary elections in Iowa, New Hampshire.

[00:25:53] President Biden is criticizing a DOJ report that cites lapses in memory noticed by special

[00:25:59] counsel investigators who had interviewed him earlier. Biden spoke in response himself.

[00:26:03] I'm a little mean and I'm an older man and I know what the hell I'm doing. I'm a president.

[00:26:08] I put this country back on a sheet. I don't need his recommendation.

[00:26:11] In their report, DOJ officials said Biden appeared to have a difficult time recalling the

[00:26:16] timeline of his son, Bo's death and did not recall his time as vice president very well either.

[00:26:22] Biden's attorneys have responded as well, claiming the references made in the DOJ report

[00:26:28] are inaccurate and inappropriate. Search and recovery efforts continue following a helicopter

[00:26:33] crash that killed five US Marines. Colonel James Ford says all next of kin are notified

[00:26:38] and US Marines have remained on guard at the crash site. Due to the hazardous terrain and weather,

[00:26:43] we're currently conducting a ground recovery. The Marine Corps will investigate the cause of this

[00:26:47] app to reduce the likelihood of future mishaps and loss of life. He says an investigation into the

[00:26:51] Marine Super Stallion crash near Pine Valley in a training mission will likely take several weeks.

[00:26:56] This is USA News. Omaha Steaks is rewriting the book on burgers with an all-new handmade

[00:27:04] texture for the juiciest homestyle burgers you've ever tasted. Their pure ground burgers are made from

[00:27:10] single cuts of real, aged Omaha Steaks. These are truly Steaks on a bun, filet mignon, ribeye,

[00:27:17] New York strip, sirloin and even brisket burgers. Now is the time to experience the exclusive burger

[00:27:24] for a new video. If you're watching this video, please check out the video on the website.

[00:27:31] An extra $20 off your order plus free shipping, you'll get 4 of each pure ground burger, so

[00:27:37] you can sample all the steak on a bun greatness. These burgers are crafted for a juicier, more

[00:27:43] tender experience, making your mouth water with every single bite. Don't wait, go to

[00:27:48] OmahaStakes.com, use promo code "Treat" at checkout and get $20 off the burger perfection

[00:27:54] flight and discover your new burger obsession, and more more may be required.

[00:28:06] Have you ever heard of loving Liberty Ladies? Well, the loving Liberty Ladies are here to help you learn our American heritage and the way it affects today's society. The Loving Liberty Ladies also have a discussion guide called Proclaim Liberty, and with this guide, you can start your own group in your hometown.

[00:28:17] Get yours today on our website at lovingliberty.net. Look for our lesson supplements too. They're

[00:28:23] free. To hear all the special offers and to join the fight for freedom in Liberty, please

[00:28:27] go to lovingliberty.net.

[00:28:30] The spirit of the American West is alive and well in Range Magazine. The award-winning quarterly

[00:28:35] devoted to the issues of the American West, each issue contains informative articles, breathtaking

[00:28:42] imagery, as well as the culture of Cowboy's spirit today, and gift ideas like this year's

[00:28:48] buckaroo calendar. Order online from rangemagazine.com. Loving Liberty Network salutes the spirit

[00:28:55] of the American West at rangemagazine.com.

[00:29:01] As a parent, is receiving a faith-based, character-focused education for your children

[00:29:05] difficult to find? Do you believe that godly principles should be a central component in

[00:29:09] your child's education? Imagine a school where faith and integrity are at its center, where

[00:29:15] heritage and responsibility instill character. For over 40 years, American Heritage School

[00:29:20] has been educating both hearts and minds, bringing out academic excellence. This is

[00:29:25] the school where character and embracing the providence of a living god are fundamental.

[00:29:30] Where students' national test scores average near the 90th percentile. With American Heritage

[00:29:35] School's Advanced Distance Education Program, distance is no longer an issue. With an accredited

[00:29:41] LDS-oriented curriculum from kindergarten through 12th grade, your children can attend

[00:29:46] from anywhere in the world. American Heritage School will prepare your child for more than

[00:29:50] a job, it will prepare them for life. To learn more, visit american-heritage.org. That's

[00:29:56] american-heritage.org.

[00:30:06] Speaking politicians, bureaucrats and edgeocrats, at all do-getters to please obey the supreme

[00:30:12] law of the land, the Constitution. This is Liberty Roundtable.

[00:30:20] Biden is above the law, ladies and gentlemen. The conclusion is that the improper handling

[00:30:26] of classified documents, that was more than a mistake, not really a criminal thing. But

[00:30:32] yet they're going to look at this well-meaning, elderly man with a port memory, and he doesn't

[00:30:38] really know what's going on around him. Biden told donors in New York that he had recently

[00:30:44] spoken to the German Chancellor who's been dead for a long time. He made a similar mistake

[00:30:49] with French President. He mixed up two foreign presidents, forgot the name of a parish in

[00:30:55] the conference where he was claiming that his memories find how dare you even question

[00:30:58] it. At the same time, the "Counsel" said, "This guy doesn't know what's going on."

[00:31:05] Joe Biden gave a rare and unexpected press conference about it and he blamed it all on

[00:31:09] his staff. What a disgrace for a leader, doctor. Total ownership or complete ownership of something

[00:31:16] that says, "Look, this is me or this is on my watch." And he's like, "Hey, I didn't

[00:31:21] keep track of my staff well enough. It's my only mistake. My staff's bad shame on them

[00:31:25] for mishandling the classified documents. My question for you is this. When you get...

[00:31:34] What's the word I'm looking for? When you get authorization or you get... What's it called?

[00:31:39] When you get permission to see... No, it's not permission. It's... You apply for the ability

[00:31:46] to see this classified information or whatever. What's that called?

[00:31:48] Oh, security clearance. Yeah, yeah, yeah. I'm so sorry. When you get a security clearance,

[00:31:53] does it say, "Hey, your staff gets the security clearance too? Your staff can just run around

[00:31:59] and move all these documents everywhere, put them in your house by your convertible and

[00:32:03] run around and put them at universities and all these different places he had documents?"

[00:32:07] Does the security clearance allow the staff just to run around and do all that kind of

[00:32:11] stuff? No, security clearances have some very constraining issues. Yes they do. Unfortunately,

[00:32:17] the White House administration brings in many people that get clearances. If you ever get

[00:32:23] a chance, read Gary Aldrich's book on limited actions. I did. I interviewed him and read

[00:32:27] the book, but here's my question then. So if it really is staff members that did what

[00:32:30] Joe's saying they did, we might let Joe off the hook if it's really the truth, but why

[00:32:35] aren't we prosecuting the folks with security clearances that violated their clearance then?

[00:32:39] Unquestioned. At some point, folks, you can't just say, "Well, it was my staff there guilty,

[00:32:45] but no harm, no foul for them. I'm not really guilty because I can't remember and no harm,

[00:32:48] no foul for me and no harm, no foul for anybody that happened and it's bad, no big deal."

[00:32:55] How does that work, doctor, with the security clearances? Somehow if it happened to you,

[00:32:59] you'd be in prison right now. Oh yeah, I'd be in prison for the rest of my life probably.

[00:33:04] I mean, and I've had security clearances for 54 years. I don't have one now, so I can't

[00:33:10] be, you know, I'm not going to claim that. But you know, I think back in history, now

[00:33:16] a lot of your listeners maybe don't remember back when Nixon resigned and Ford became president

[00:33:23] and he gave the pardon to Nixon. And I just mentioned this in the fact that there were

[00:33:33] people, I mean, that wasn't that long ago, kids, it was 50 years ago. But there were

[00:33:40] still people that held staff positions that were, were not, you know, want to be lap dog

[00:33:49] kiss-ups that were there all the time. When Gerald Ford did that pardon, he had his oppressed

[00:33:57] secretary, a very, very close personal friend of him, not me, but him. His close personal

[00:34:04] friend, he had a press, a press secretary that, you know, stood up in front of the crowd and

[00:34:09] he fielded questions and stuff like that. He resigned. He resigned in protest. In spite

[00:34:15] of the fact he was a close personal friend of Gerald Ford, in spite of the fact this

[00:34:19] was a cat bird seat where he kind of controlled the narrative and everything like that. And

[00:34:24] he said, heck no, stronger than that. And he resigned. And what I wonder sometimes if

[00:34:30] all of these lap dogs that we've got that are, that are basically little puppets of somebody

[00:34:37] are just, we have lost back even 50 years ago, in my memory, which maybe not as good

[00:34:45] as everybody might want to hope it is, but the fact of the matter is, there was still

[00:34:50] enough integrity for people to say, no, I'm not going to stand here and try and put a

[00:34:56] spin on this thing that's going to make you look like you're a hero. Now, there was plenty

[00:35:00] of spin put on it. Don't get me wrong. But the press secretary said, I am not going

[00:35:05] to stoop that far down. So what are Biden's people doing? They get up and lie through

[00:35:10] their teeth. I mean, they hide the Easter eggs for him every morning and let him go

[00:35:15] find him. I don't know what they do. I don't know what they're doing. But, but the fact

[00:35:19] of the matter is we have a bunch of kiss ups that are in the administration right now.

[00:35:24] And nobody's saying it's time that this guy is no longer considered or holding. Well,

[00:35:32] and that brings up my ultimate question. Is this a drum beat way to take Joe down gracefully

[00:35:39] to say, you know what, the poor old man meant well, but he couldn't handle it. And really

[00:35:43] then let him resign or let something happen. Are we going to create the drum beat to where

[00:35:47] it's like, Hey, somebody else can come in and gracefully replace him on their democratic

[00:35:50] ticket? Is that what the plan is here? Why the assault on Joe right before the election

[00:35:56] in all these different ways? And you can say, well, none of them are criminal yet, not yet.

[00:36:01] But at the same time, what if it turns out the Joe and Donald can't run? What are we going

[00:36:07] to see in this race as a result of all this? The interesting thing is Tucker Carlson's interview

[00:36:11] coming out at the same time they say Joe's really not fit to serve. And then the president

[00:36:16] of Russia saying Joe doesn't even run the country. What are you talking about? This timing is

[00:36:23] interesting, if not intentional. Putin's very astute. He's very well briefed. And he is an

[00:36:32] intelligent guy. Now, you know, I'm not calling Putin old guy. I mean, he's younger than me.

[00:36:36] Okay. So I'm, I'd be calling myself an old guy. Okay. But but so don't get me wrong on this.

[00:36:43] But Putin's he's, but he's going to be 72 this year. But, but he's, he came across as a vigorous,

[00:36:51] mentally agile individual that was able to hold his own. And Tucker Carlson and him had a good

[00:36:57] exchange. And he played his role. He kind of spanked Tucker a couple of times. Not really.

[00:37:03] He was, he was a little more diplomatic than that. But, but you know, you would have expected that

[00:37:08] from a Russian president. So, you know, I kind of thought, okay, there he is. But, but the fact of

[00:37:13] the matter is he is, is not a doddery, old man. And he's vigorous and active. I mean, like you

[00:37:19] say, he'll be 72 this year. In fact, it's not that long from now. I don't think that's, I probably

[00:37:25] ought to look it up and make sure. But, but at any rate, so a lot of people say, oh yeah, 72. I

[00:37:31] mean, he's kind of on a, you know, in the sunset years, you know, stuff like that. But he didn't

[00:37:36] come across that way. And, and so Joe Biden, I, if, if he and Putin were to meet, it would be

[00:37:43] mental gymnastics to keep up with him for Joe. And Joe wouldn't even maybe know who he's in the

[00:37:49] presence of him. By the way, Putin couldn't remember the last time he talked to Joe. That,

[00:37:53] right there is an amazing revelation. So, and is a very problematic revelation too. If we're

[00:38:00] trying to have peace and we're trying to back away from war, like Joe claims, why wouldn't you

[00:38:06] try to speak with this guy in hammer out of plan, an agreement? And the Russian president highlighted,

[00:38:12] we used to be great friends until Joe came around. Yeah. Yeah, he talked about how he'd had

[00:38:19] discussions with Bush. And I got my plenty of grief with all the presidents we've had in recent

[00:38:26] centuries. But, but, but at any rate, you know, he talked about, you know,

[00:38:31] Bush and Trump and everybody's going to go, Oh, okay, there it is. There's an agreement. There's,

[00:38:38] there's admission that Trump was a Russian puppet. Oh, bravo Sierra. You know, world leaders

[00:38:46] are supposed to be able to have exchanges. And you know what, they're supposed to be able to,

[00:38:51] to diffuse things at that level. I look back at John F. Kennedy and, and Khrushchev.

[00:38:56] And some of the things that happened that backed us away from nuclear war. I mean,

[00:39:01] I remember those days, you know, like, I don't want to be like a John Kerry or anything like that,

[00:39:06] but I'll just say it. I remember those days is all there were yesterday, you know, kind of thing.

[00:39:10] When, yeah, I always say that happened the other day and my family was like, the other day,

[00:39:15] that was like five years ago, I know, but was it today? And they're like, no. And then I said,

[00:39:18] is the other one, wasn't it? Well, if it was 60 years ago, I mean, it's still not yesterday,

[00:39:22] but it's the other day. I know it was, it was the other day. It's not today. It's the other one.

[00:39:27] It was a long minute ago, but at any rate, um, no, uh, Kennedy and Khrushchev. I mean, these,

[00:39:35] they were not rolling the dice, letting some, you know, stooge that's, that's on your foreign

[00:39:41] affairs staff, you know, pull her head out of wherever it is and, and save the nation of the world

[00:39:48] from, from holocaust, you know, a nuclear holocaust. Kennedy and Khrushchev talked through this stuff.

[00:39:54] They resolved it by saying, we'll pull our missiles out of Cuba if you pull your missiles out of,

[00:39:59] uh, Turkey. Okay. That was the whole thing. That's exactly what Putin says happened

[00:40:05] to bring about the invasion of the Ukraine. The United States kept pushing their buttons,

[00:40:11] pushing their buttons, pushing their buttons until the right against their border tanks and

[00:40:15] everything. Nuke. I mean, they weren't, we weren't, I don't know. Maybe we did have nukes there, but,

[00:40:20] but I'm saying there were bases. There were training centers. There was heavy artillery.

[00:40:25] And the fact of the matter is that we advanced NATO 1000 miles without, I mean, without blinking

[00:40:34] an eyelash, we said we wouldn't go one inch, not one inch. Go ahead and skip the bridge.

[00:40:40] There's now calls to invoke the 25th amendment, um, when the special counsel said that, hey,

[00:40:47] Joe Biden has severe cognitive disabilities. Uh, what do you think of invoking the 25th

[00:40:53] amendment on this thing? That's what they tried to do to Donald that failed spectacularly,

[00:40:57] but this is where projection happens. They projected that on the Republicans. Now it's

[00:41:01] coming back to haunt the Democrats. I think with Joe Biden, it's kind of a real thing here.

[00:41:05] Oh, karma comes around.

[00:41:07] like you. There's only one problem with it. If you do this, then you get Kamala. Yeah. Yeah. I don't

[00:41:13] know if I have Joe there than Kamala right now. Well, I mean, there's same strings that are pulling

[00:41:19] him are going to pull her. There's no question about it. I mean, the people that are in charge are

[00:41:24] not going to let her become the commander in chief. It's just not going to happen. She hasn't been

[00:41:31] down to her Zarena job or whatever it is, Zare job on the border. I mean, maybe she got within 40

[00:41:38] miles of the border or something. I went to the border. No, you didn't. You know, that's not even

[00:41:42] a close town, you know, but, but no, name one thing, one thing that she has touched that

[00:41:52] hasn't turned to mush or that she never touched at all. Because what in the blazes is she doing?

[00:42:00] She's in. I was going to say, if it had been a man, I'd say an empty suit. But but

[00:42:05] well, in my opinion, what you got with her is you've got a lot of damage being done behind the scenes.

[00:42:10] So she looks like a buffoon on the surface. And she may be, but but behind the scenes, I have a

[00:42:15] feeling that she's doing things that are undermining the United States in very critical, very influential

[00:42:20] ways that when it comes to light 10, 20, 30, 40 years later, because you know, the deep state seems

[00:42:27] to be able to keep their secrets pretty well. I'm convinced that in 20, 30, 40 years, you'll be like,

[00:42:32] Oh, I can't believe that we don't she did that. You're not going to know about it now, but I'm

[00:42:35] convinced that she's undermining the United States in very fundamental ways right now behind the

[00:42:39] scenes. Don't have proof of it. But she's not as there as a derelict. I'm pretty confident that

[00:42:45] there's reasons and there's things that she's accomplishing. But how do they get rid of Kamala

[00:42:50] now if they if they you know, how do they you can't get rid of this quote colored female?

[00:42:54] I mean, that would be disaster for the Democrats at this point, right?

[00:42:59] Well, no, it could it doesn't have to be. And I'll tell you why I know I know in a way we could say

[00:43:06] they've painted themselves into a corner and all that kind of stuff. And what you're saying

[00:43:10] absolutely has validity. However, with the right replacement, they could do it. And I'll

[00:43:17] hold on the deep state will not do the right replacement. Why not? Why not Michelle?

[00:43:23] And everybody goes, holy cow. Well, Michelle might be jumping into this. That's my point is

[00:43:30] if you can get Joe to somehow resign and somehow Kamala has an issue or whatever else you could

[00:43:34] literally have a Michelle front and center in a heartbeat. Yeah, you're really good. And Michelle

[00:43:40] could come up out of the woodwork. I mean, the the the big conventions aren't that far away. I

[00:43:47] mean, we're in the year kids. And and so stuff like that could could just bubble to the surface.

[00:43:53] And like I say, it looks like an impossible conundrum for them. And I can I can see the logic

[00:43:59] reason and the analysis and everything like that. But there's got to be people that are working

[00:44:04] three dimensional chess on this thing that are behind the scenes that are saying, okay,

[00:44:09] we have this then that how do we do this? I used to do this kind of stuff in my old life.

[00:44:14] But but there was always an analysis going on behind the scenes. And and for for them to not have

[00:44:22] a trick up their sleeve or rabbit in their hat or whatever, what is absolutely unthinkable.

[00:44:28] So it just is not going to happen. And we can make them look like they're stumbling

[00:44:33] like a drunken sailor into the next bar, but they are not boom, boom, it's going to hit. And so

[00:44:40] it might be that Joe Biden and Kamala are both puppets and they are derelict. And that may be

[00:44:46] truthful, but it doesn't change the fact that very sinister plans are being hatched and are

[00:44:50] being moved forward behind the scenes. George Washington University law professor John Turley

[00:44:57] or Jonathan Turley basically said on Thursday that factors that preclude recommending charges

[00:45:04] for Joe Biden could cause problems for his reelection. So in this council, he went in and said,

[00:45:10] I can't remember, I can't remember, I can't remember, he kind of pulled a Bill Clinton, right?

[00:45:13] And then Reagan did this roundly. Yeah, that's right. Okay. Now then when he comes out, he's

[00:45:21] trying to say, no, that's not true. I've got a great memory. I'm fine. Don't worry about me. But

[00:45:24] the statements that he made could come back to haunt him for his reelection. You know, I don't

[00:45:31] know what's going to happen here, but I have a feeling that they're moving the chess pieces

[00:45:34] to create a fall for Joe in some way. And I don't know how or what exactly I just know this.

[00:45:39] I don't think that he can cognitively handle. They want to basically let him finish his presidency.

[00:45:44] So what do we got a year from a little less than a year from now to get whatever? I don't know how

[00:45:49] they're going to navigate that because his gaffes are too great at this point. Just too much.

[00:45:53] Every time he speaks, every time he appears, it's just disaster. And I don't think they can take

[00:45:59] the rest between now and a whole year from now. No, I I've been watching this since the day, well,

[00:46:05] long time before we went in. But but I got to tell you, he's lasted longer than I thought he was going

[00:46:10] to. I mean, I'll admit that I thought that they would have pulled the plug and Kamala would be in

[00:46:15] there. We would have a first female black president and you know, everything's celebration. And now

[00:46:21] we got a an incumbent running in 2024. I mean, that's that's kind of how I saw it playing out.

[00:46:28] But it hasn't. And so they've got something else up their sleeve or their other rabbit in their

[00:46:34] other hat or something like that. You're right about that. And here's the statistic in my opinion.

[00:46:38] They're watching very closely 77% of voters. That's 77% of voters last August in a 2023

[00:46:47] Associated Press.

[00:46:52] Newark, Paul saying that he is too old to serve effectively as president. And I want to amend

[00:46:58] that because again, they play games with words. I don't think he's too old because I think that

[00:47:03] there's a lot of 81 year olds that could do fine. Okay, Ron Paul when he was anyone would have been

[00:47:08] fine. Okay, so it isn't that he's too old as much as that it's a Joe Biden is his he's got

[00:47:14] cognitive decline and health problems that preclude him from being able to move forward. And I just

[00:47:20] don't know. I mean, he's lasted way longer than I thought he would too. But at the same time,

[00:47:24] I don't know if he can last the whole next year. Now, Hillary Clinton literally jumping in and

[00:47:31] getting a lot of prime time. She went on the mainstream press, Hillary Clinton quote.

[00:47:35] Tucker Carlson was a useful idiot during the interview that aired Wednesday evening on

[00:47:41] MSNBC, which is the interview with Vladimir Putin. So now they're giving Hillary prime time

[00:47:46] to criticize Tucker and saying how dare he this guy, you know, Tucker's kind of an insurrectionist

[00:47:53] now. He's a bad guy. He should have never interviewed, interfered. This is out of control. Why is

[00:47:59] Hillary now literally the one teed up to call the shots or to make the points? Why would we have

[00:48:06] old Hillary doing that? She'd been disgraced back in 2016 when she lost and complained it was voter

[00:48:11] fraud. Now, literally eight years later, she's rolling in going, Hey, Tucker's an idiot.

[00:48:17] Joe's this. What is she talking about? But how did she get that cred to continue? And the answer

[00:48:23] means to impress deep state, right? Yeah, I'm, and then Hillary, I mean, it's not like she never

[00:48:31] had any baggage. And certainly her husband is one of the biggest bags that could be held around

[00:48:35] anywhere. But her giving away of our strategic, you know, minerals and all those kinds of things,

[00:48:41] it's like, Holy Hannah. And Hillary Clinton. I mean, she's had her, shall we say, decline.

[00:48:48] I mean, she's had collapses, very public collapses, you know, and she's just, she's shrill. And it's

[00:48:58] like, there's maybe she's on some medications. Now, I don't know, I don't know what it is. I mean,

[00:49:04] I'm speculating, of course. But but I just think that there's there trotting trotting out anybody

[00:49:11] they can to take away from what should have been recognized as a major exposure of foreign policy

[00:49:22] shortfall in the current administration. The president is supposed to be the chief diplomat,

[00:49:28] if you will, of the United States. And you know, you can argue about, well, okay, I mean, he's

[00:49:33] he's limited in this net, the other, I understand all those issues. But but the the face that's put

[00:49:39] out there is this the chief executive officer, if you will, of the United States is the president,

[00:49:45] the president brings treaties to the Senate for ratification. Our president hasn't come out of

[00:49:51] his basement, really literally. I mean, he goes out gets an ice cream cone occasionally and tips

[00:49:56] over his bike and, you know, things like that and talks about people that are dead, people that he's

[00:50:02] talking with lately and everything. I mean, you know, and I people would say probably that I'm being

[00:50:07] very harsh to him, but I'm characterizing what his presidency has been. And people have got to

[00:50:15] recognize that as this chief diplomat of the United States, he has fallen way short. Some reporter

[00:50:22] guy goes to the Kremlin, interviews the president of Russia. Holy cow. And the president of Russia

[00:50:29] can't even remember on the interview, he said this. He can't remember the last time he talked to

[00:50:36] Joe Biden. Biden's handlers know that the the Putin would eat his lunch. If they had a one-on-one

[00:50:44] discussion, Putin would be would wonder if he was looking, we have a faux war going on. I say

[00:50:50] focus is not properly declared, but we're there between the Ukraine and Russia. And Joe hasn't

[00:50:55] talked to the Russian leader to see if he can come to it an understanding or possibly a solution

[00:51:01] or a back away or a piece of court or agreement or whatever you want to say. And there's been no

[00:51:05] effort in that. Joe hasn't done that at all. National security is really the situation here,

[00:51:11] folks. How do we send our children in a harm's way, spend billions of dollars and do all these

[00:51:15] things, pick sides and, you know, then now they criticize Tucker Tucker said, I tried to interview

[00:51:19] the Ukrainian president too, but he won't do it. My question is, how come if he's the good guy and,

[00:51:26] you know, Putin's the bad guy, why not interview him too? Because he won't do it. Now it gets worse

[00:51:32] because Putin confirms to Tucker Carlson that, you know what, Biden is not even running the country.

[00:51:38] Then Tucker said, well, who is, you know, what, who is running the country? And the answer from a

[00:51:44] lot of more Putin is the same forces, which have always run it. You might change presidents,

[00:51:49] but you don't change who's in real power. That's who we have to deal with. Joe is just a facade for

[00:51:56] the power structure. Putin said, you look at that and you put that along with this special counsel

[00:52:01] in the mishandling of these documents and the gaffes on in public with the latest press conferences.

[00:52:07] And you say, this happening all at the same time is there's got to be

[00:52:11] fire where there's smoke. There's got to be something more here that we're not seeing to have this

[00:52:18] all culminate at the same time. Dr. Bradley, when asked about a possible second term for Donald

[00:52:24] Trump, Vladimir Putin said, for one thing, he never insulted us. In other words,

[00:52:30] hint Joe Biden has insulted us the Russians multiple times, you know, but Donald Trump

[00:52:34] never insulted us. He has a great respect for Russia. We will start from a position of

[00:52:40] friendship and trust. And then all problems are sizable. We can get this done. Trust me,

[00:52:45] Vladimir Putin said, that's a very interesting statement.

[00:52:48] And we're told that the world just hates Donald and Donald is going to run the whole nation off

[00:52:54] the cliff. So we got to have Joe and the Russia Vladimir Putin is basically saying, look,

[00:53:00] I haven't talked to Joe. I can't I won't talk to Joe. There's no point, but I would talk to Donald

[00:53:05] and we could start from a place of possible solutions. He blatantly said that in the interview.

[00:53:12] How could you get more clear on the world stage than that, doctor?

[00:53:15] Well, that's that's the thing. As I've said a number of times, Putin is a very astute man,

[00:53:19] well briefed. He's plugged into what's happening in the world. And the fact of the matter is that

[00:53:26] he knows the deep states there. He's inferred as much by saying Biden not running things.

[00:53:33] And it's this truthful statement. He's being honorable in what he says. He has a relationship

[00:53:38] with Trump. I mean, all of those things. But here's how the mainstream is going to play that.

[00:53:43] They're going to say, see, see, Trump is a puppet of Putin. And that is exactly the opposite of

[00:53:49] what the message was. It's a Kennedy Khrushchev conversation, not an incompetent, daughtering old

[00:53:58] man against the sharpest of whip, foreign power. So, you know, yeah, there's, there's a lot of,

[00:54:05] we're going to talk about this more and what it means for America, elections, civil war,

[00:54:09] and a whole lot of things. We'll talk about it more in seconds. Our one in the can.

[00:54:13] Dr. Scott Bradley with me. Check out his collegiate series at FreedomRisingSun.com.

[00:54:18] It's called to preserve the nation. Also, join his weekly webinars, Q&As on the

[00:54:22] Constitution and more. That's FreedomRisingSun.com. Donate to us liberally as well. LibertyRoundtable.com,

[00:54:29] LovingLiberty.net, spread the word, share the love. We declare this nation shall endure.

[00:54:33] God save the Republic of the United States of America.

[00:54:37] [MUSIC]

[00:54:47] [MUSIC PLAYING]