Radio Show Hour 1 – 04/29/2024

[00:00:00] Live from the top of the Rocky Mountains, the crossroads of the West. You are listening

[00:00:19] to the Liberty Roundtable Radio Talk Show. All right. Happy to have you along my fellow

[00:00:26] Americans, Sam Bushman live on your radio. Hard hitting news that it refuse to use no

[00:00:32] doubt starts now. This my fellow Americans is the broadcast for. Wow. It's already April

[00:00:39] 29th of the year of our Lord, 2024. This is hour one of two and they go all ways to protect

[00:00:45] life, liberty and property and to promote God, family and country on your radio in the traditions

[00:00:50] of our founding fathers. Yes indeed. We use the blueprint for Liberty. That's the preval

[00:00:53] of the land, the Constitution with the United States of America as our guide. And as

[00:00:57] you know, we reject revolution lessons. Jesus revolution. Then we're in actually

[00:01:01] the checks and balances are brilliantly put in place by the founding fathers and

[00:01:05] one of the great peaceful solutions. We still have it. I figure tips that doctors

[00:01:08] in the house Dr. Scott Bradley's with me. Welcome to the broadcast, sir. Good morning

[00:01:13] to all and I'm hoping everyone has a wonderful week ahead of them. So maybe we'll maybe

[00:01:21] we'll have some good news this week. What do you think Sam? Now we're going to pray

[00:01:24] for it work towards it and hopefully we can even make good news by the American people's

[00:01:29] hard work. That's for sure. I have a little bit of good news which we'll get into later

[00:01:33] in the broadcast today. First, I don't know what you want to call it story up on the

[00:01:39] docket today, ladies and gentlemen. George Washington University law professor John

[00:01:45] Turley argued over the weekend that the Supreme Court needs to strike a very

[00:01:54] delicate balance when ruling on whether presidents have quote full immunity,

[00:02:00] absolute immunity from prosecution. Now, basically the bottom line is you need to

[00:02:06] strike a balance on presidential immunity. A little more on the story and then to

[00:02:10] Dr. Scott Bradley for a constitutional breakdown on this thing. Turley made the

[00:02:14] remarks during interview with Shannon Bream I guess on Fox. I don't watch

[00:02:24] Shannon Bream so I don't really know but there you have it. There's a slippery

[00:02:28] slope on both sides he says but he was surprised about the justices on the left

[00:02:34] who weren't concerned at all about how extreme the argument would be to have

[00:02:40] what no immunity or absolute immunity. Okay, there are things that you can't

[00:02:47] criminalize that the president does. Well then the debate becomes and this

[00:02:53] here's how they play the game. They don't stick with constitutional

[00:02:55] language. They make up their own language so they can create their own crafted

[00:02:58] terms. So what they're going to say is, yeah but what about official acts of the

[00:03:03] president? You know under an official act he can do anything he wants to. I

[00:03:07] submit to you that they're playing games with language. They are lying to

[00:03:10] you. I agree that you know what when they're involved in quote official

[00:03:14] acts. You know there's a difference than their own personal actions and

[00:03:18] beliefs and you know when they're obeying and when their actions are

[00:03:22] squared with the supreme law it's different than when they're not.

[00:03:25] I mean I get all that. I get the nuanced issues. The problem is if we're not very

[00:03:29] careful they're playing games and the pendulum could swing from court to court

[00:03:33] from president to president if we're not very careful. Yeah what are acts that

[00:03:39] are part of a quote an official function or not? That's how they're

[00:03:43] playing the game doctor. What do you think of doctor or I'm sorry Jonathan

[00:03:48] Turley's comments? What do you think of the whole discussion? This is

[00:03:51] getting dangerous fast. Well Turley is an attorney and they have pretty high

[00:03:58] level of pride in their priestcraft that they run. Their own if you wear their

[00:04:07] own cult called attorneys. They really do believe they're pretty top of the

[00:04:13] stack so his arrogance shouldn't surprise us but if you go back to

[00:04:19] the Constitution and you look at how things are there well first let me to

[00:04:22] adjust this official act thing. Is it an official act of the president to send

[00:04:28] tomahawk missiles into Syria hundreds of them or at least a hundred of them as

[00:04:33] Trump did in a response. It's an official act in my view but it's

[00:04:37] criminal in my view as well. That's the exact point. The you know the

[00:04:44] authority to wage war to enter war is found constitutionally in article one

[00:04:50] section eight clause 11 where Congress holds that authority. There's no

[00:04:54] means the president did it when they never got authority would be criminal

[00:04:58] act sir. Okay well the 69th Federalist paper is an expose about that if you

[00:05:05] will and how what the president is he's the first admiral or general

[00:05:09] basically as Hamilton explained it. He's not the guy that does the war or makes

[00:05:14] the decision or crosses the Rubicon or whatever you want to call it but see

[00:05:19] what happened we have these stupid idiotic unconstitutional congressional

[00:05:25] enactments to say this is an authorization for military force. Okay and

[00:05:31] none of those none of those have any bearing on the Constitution so here

[00:05:36] we have a president that sent in a hundred tomahawk missiles on the Syria

[00:05:42] unconstitutionally he would claim it was an official act of his office based

[00:05:49] upon being the commander-in-chief. And I would claim it may be an official act

[00:05:53] but it's a war it turns him into a war criminal as he violates the United

[00:05:57] States and all international laws if you want to believe in international

[00:06:01] laws. The commander-in-chief launched missiles in an unconstitutional act

[00:06:07] okay so the problem becomes people think there are official acts people

[00:06:14] think that an official act is putting out an executive order where they ban

[00:06:18] bump stocks or pistol braces or reloading your handgun or whatever I mean

[00:06:25] any kind of thing those the president has not got a creative power to create

[00:06:31] law which they claim they have based upon and it's you say oh it's a regulation

[00:06:36] or it's in other words what you're saying is the official act isn't literally

[00:06:39] official it's criminal and I agree the only reason I call it an official act

[00:06:42] is because we act accordingly we send and spend money and we all kind of

[00:06:46] things based on those quote official acts. I don't believe their official

[00:06:50] acts that they're criminal at all if you want to talk constitutionally so

[00:06:52] I say it's an official act because they let it hold weight as if it is but

[00:06:57] the truth is it's not at all it's fact it's acting criminally personally and

[00:07:01] it's a war crime not only in the United States but internationally. So we are so

[00:07:06] far adrift now on this thing that things that are criminal acts are being

[00:07:10] called official acts and shouldn't be but there is a process constitutionally

[00:07:15] to handle this and again you're going to find attorneys all over the

[00:07:20] spectrum on this get their constitution out read article one

[00:07:24] section to the last clause and it says the House of Representatives shall

[00:07:28] now let me stop you really quick to kind of insert this for people's knowledge

[00:07:31] Dr. Bradley is looking to the official supreme law what most of these

[00:07:35] attorneys are doing when they get it all nuanced and they have all these

[00:07:38] different quote opinions on it they're going to look at case law case law

[00:07:42] does not hold a candle to supreme law ladies and gentlemen go ahead sir okay

[00:07:48] first of all let me address just a moment for that because people today

[00:07:52] there's a document out that it's an annotated Constitution and those that

[00:07:58] want to rewrite the Constitution hold that up in the you know the committee

[00:08:04] testifying situations that I go to where they're in a legislative session and

[00:08:10] and you know this little hand held pocket Constitution that a lot of people

[00:08:15] carry they'll hold that up and they'll say your people will say this is the

[00:08:20] Constitution it's not and they hold up a document is nearly 3,000 pages long you

[00:08:25] can buy it from the congressional printing office and everything nearly

[00:08:29] 3,000 pages long they say this is the Constitution well what has happened is

[00:08:33] that it this new Constitution nuances the real Constitution using court

[00:08:40] declarations and legislative enactments but if you'll read carefully

[00:08:45] article 5 of the United States Constitution court declarations and

[00:08:50] legislative enactments cannot modify the Constitution the little pocket

[00:08:55] Constitution you carry is the existing Constitution that cannot be modified

[00:09:01] except by the article 5 process where they were as amended okay so they're

[00:09:07] holding up a 3,000 page almost 3,000 page document they're saying this is

[00:09:11] what it's become by court decree and legislative enactment no they violated

[00:09:17] it if the Constitution has been changed by that it violated article 5 and

[00:09:21] therefore you cannot say this is a legitimate anything okay so we have

[00:09:27] this little pocket Constitution it's really pretty straightforward written

[00:09:30] for the common man and woman to be able to read and understand but in the

[00:09:34] final clause of article 1 section 2 it says the House of Representatives

[00:09:40] shall choose their speaker and other officers and shall have the soul power

[00:09:45] of impeachment okay so there's a process it's a domino process that has to

[00:09:51] happen okay now the Congress has to grow a backbone because they have

[00:09:56] spineless individuals there I think slugs and snails are way ahead of

[00:10:01] them because they have a place in God's creation but at any rate they

[00:10:05] have the soul power of impeachment then let's go over to article 3 excuse

[00:10:09] me article 1 section 3 okay the Senate shall have the soul power to trial

[00:10:14] impeachments okay and they can remove someone for concurrence of two-thirds

[00:10:19] of the members go read that again that little clause is not that long but I

[00:10:23] won't take up so much time reading all these things okay then the next clause

[00:10:27] says in in article 1 section 3 the final clause in section 3 go ahead and

[00:10:32] skip the break continue doctor judgment in cases of impeachment shall not

[00:10:37] extend further than to removal from office and this qualification do hold and

[00:10:43] enjoy any office of honor trust or profit under the United States but the

[00:10:47] party maybe well to convict all parties anyway but this means the

[00:10:51] individual convicted shall not excuse me shall nevertheless be liable and

[00:10:57] subject to indictment trial judgment and punishment according to the law so

[00:11:05] in my view if someone has abandoned their constitutional oath of office and

[00:11:13] they have done something stupid like create law or let's let's go back over

[00:11:19] to article 2 where the president shall take care that the laws be faithfully

[00:11:23] executed where the president is not carrying out the law that congress

[00:11:28] constitutionally created to handle immigration issues the president is

[00:11:33] liable for impeachment okay so let's say the president starts a war

[00:11:38] unconstitutionally we have an impeachment it goes to trial they're removed from

[00:11:44] office and then they're able to carry out so it's be clear impeachment by the

[00:11:49] house trial by the Senate removed from office by the Senate and now open to

[00:11:53] go ahead indictment trial judgment and punishment according to the law first

[00:11:58] of all if they're removed from office they can hold no more office ever

[00:12:01] again and that's kind of a cool thing but the point of the matter being that it

[00:12:06] is a process and it's just like these people not just like but it's similar to

[00:12:12] these people that we constantly have screaming out it's treason we got

[00:12:17] to execute these guys and everything there hasn't been any trial there hasn't

[00:12:20] been a charge there hasn't been a due process and yet there hasn't even

[00:12:25] been an impeachment in most cases and if the impeachment happens there's

[00:12:28] never been a trial of that impeachment per se like me or to remove from office

[00:12:32] until all those things happen they're not subject to criminal trials right

[00:12:37] correct that's and that's the quintessential point the Constitution says

[00:12:40] so here we have a sitting president a president that had the slightest

[00:12:46] understanding of their constitutional authority they ought to read article

[00:12:49] two before they actually go run for office and they recognize that the

[00:12:54] party agenda is not constitutional and so what what happens constantly is

[00:13:01] we're trying to get people into office that will weadle their way into our

[00:13:06] hearts and get that agenda carried out and so they do it at every level I

[00:13:11] mean you do it at a legislative level you get somebody that oh yeah these

[00:13:14] guys are pro-abortion or anti-abortion whatever let's let's go with

[00:13:18] constitutional then let's follow the process they do it in the judicial

[00:13:22] process where the president tries to get his agenda to be fostered in the

[00:13:28] in the Supreme Court because they say the Supreme Court is the Constitution it's

[00:13:34] a living constitutional convention which is a falsehood again why doesn't

[00:13:38] follow okay that then here's the other deal though the the people that try

[00:13:45] and carry out an agenda let's just take Majorcas was impeached impeachment

[00:13:50] by the House which they have the sole power to do is a set of indictments they

[00:13:56] bring charges it's it's kind of like you're going to go to court and the

[00:13:59] prosecuting attorney's gonna handle things they bring an indictment and then it

[00:14:03] goes to the Senate and they try that case now let me stop you there for a

[00:14:08] second just for clarity on the local level so people understand and this is

[00:14:11] why you know they want sheriff's to just start arresting everyone everywhere

[00:14:14] as well how come there's not a gutsy sheriff that can just start arresting

[00:14:17] people they claim because the sheriff is to investigate bring together a full

[00:14:21] indictment and bring it to the other branch of government there's a check and

[00:14:25] balance in all cases relating to these proceedings to make sure that no one gets

[00:14:29] too much power nobody can just ramrod something through is designed on purpose

[00:14:33] to slow down and make sure that enough people are aboard that it's actually

[00:14:37] a rightful action right well it's not just having them on board it's having

[00:14:41] justification it's based upon legal facts now I'll give you an example

[00:14:46] let's just go back to the covid con I mean it was a complete con run by covid

[00:14:52] cowards without any scientific anything behind it but look but we won't need to

[00:14:55] debate or discuss or expand on that but what we did in our local area

[00:15:01] was we went to sheriffs well we have a sheriff in our county we have

[00:15:05] different police chiefs and based upon the municipality that's involved

[00:15:10] and you say okay what are you going to do about this mask mandate

[00:15:14] okay these these demands that children that will not wear a mask in school could

[00:15:19] be flying in our state it was absolutely draconian what our

[00:15:23] governor did he declared thousand dollar fines

[00:15:27] and six months in jail if a child would not wear a mask

[00:15:30] or a student or I mean a teacher or whatever and

[00:15:35] by the way the legislature let them get away with it because our constitution

[00:15:39] in Utah specifically says that no different branch of our government even

[00:15:44] in an emergency can usurp what's rightfully the other so the

[00:15:48] governor cannot be a legislator even though the

[00:15:51] spineless legislature went along with it but but the governor makes these

[00:15:55] laws quote unquote okay so in questioning uh the police officers

[00:16:01] you know the police chiefs and the sheriffs what are you guys going to

[00:16:04] do well if the laws we're going to force

[00:16:07] the law well what is the law what is the law okay that needs to be the question

[00:16:13] give me the article section and clause if you will

[00:16:17] that that this that's in code that's in code

[00:16:21] in the state or in your county or in your municipality that says i'm going

[00:16:25] to write this on the ticket you you broke section one

[00:16:29] dash five dash seven what are you going to put on the ticket

[00:16:33] well it's not there there is not a law and that's what it really came down to

[00:16:39] the police chief says or the sheriff said well we're going to enforce the law

[00:16:46] okay tell me what the law is well you're supposed to wear a mask

[00:16:50] okay tell me where that is in code well it's not there so can you write a

[00:16:55] ticket for something that's not in code no we can't we will enforce the

[00:16:59] law see you've got to kind of deconstruct

[00:17:02] and the sheriff can't just run around willy nilly

[00:17:05] and and say oh i'm going to arrest you i'm going to arrest this guy i'm gonna you

[00:17:08] say what what why am i arrested and they've got to have

[00:17:13] some kind of and they knew this when they arrested people too and they played

[00:17:16] games they use terms vague terms like trespassing in public places and things

[00:17:20] sure to try to hold people and make things stick when they had no other

[00:17:24] way to do it and they knew that it was a ruse

[00:17:26] they knew that it was a dishonest lie and that's where in my opinion

[00:17:30] even all the way down to the local level they had to pick sides

[00:17:34] and in most cases sadly they picked tyranny because there's processes put in

[00:17:39] place based on the supreme law of the land and those processes were

[00:17:42] absolutely violated repeatedly and then they used

[00:17:47] all kinds of dishonest manipulations to hold people

[00:17:51] to try to create accountability and and the truth is

[00:17:56] you know what most of them should have been impeached should have been

[00:17:59] removed should have been tried should have been

[00:18:01] prosecuted to the full extent of law none of those things happened

[00:18:05] because the american people aren't caught up enough on the processes

[00:18:08] to hold people to account for the processes most folks just went oh goodness

[00:18:12] if the governor says that by golly that's what we have to do

[00:18:15] or you know whatever we need to understand there are checks and

[00:18:18] balances vertically and horizontally in our system and those checks and

[00:18:22] balances are designed to make sure that a

[00:18:25] not only are people doing what's right but they're not taking power into

[00:18:28] themselves that they're truly obeying the the rule of law

[00:18:31] that they're respecting rights that you know that all these processes must be

[00:18:34] followed in america the problem is the lack of knowledge

[00:18:38] allowed the processes to break down or be violated and because of that then we

[00:18:43] have nothing but trouble on our hands we've got to go back to the processes

[00:18:46] the founders put in place with the checks and balances and

[00:18:49] and all the different details think about the president he has

[00:18:51] enough immunity in the sense that hey the house must look at what he

[00:18:56] does and decide if it's worthy of putting together the indictments

[00:19:00] the senate must look at what the house put together and say is a legitimate

[00:19:03] if so let's you know convict and remove and then beyond that hey now we can

[00:19:10] look at these different issues in terms of true trials there's a lot of

[00:19:14] immunity built into the system it's not just a question of do they have

[00:19:18] immunity or don't they and do they have immunity under official acts

[00:19:22] or not see now what we're doing is we're jettisoning the process

[00:19:26] and making up our own rules to try to play games outside of the supreme law

[00:19:30] aren't we doctor well you know back in 1971 and i know you were pretty young

[00:19:35] at that time sam but there was a kind of a cult

[00:19:38] movie came out called billy jack tom lochlin

[00:19:43] directed it and he was in it he started it all that kind of stuff

[00:19:46] uh you know what people ought to see it once in their life anyway but

[00:19:49] there's a classic line in there uh there's the town's people and the

[00:19:56] sheriff are there they're going to do an unlawful act

[00:19:59] and billy jack shows up and he's going to stand him down billy jack's well it's

[00:20:05] it's he's a former green beret and part native american and all that kind of

[00:20:09] stuff okay so anyway somebody haulers out of the mob

[00:20:13] that's there billy we got the law with us and billy jack says when the

[00:20:19] police break the law there is no law and he levers it around into his

[00:20:23] 30 30 okay so anyway uh

[00:20:29] that's a classic line by the way tom lochlin

[00:20:34] was very much responsible for getting the 1968 gun control act there were him

[00:20:40] and five other big screen people that helped get

[00:20:44] that 1968 gun control act passed and so just because the law i mean billy

[00:20:49] jack says that in a movie doesn't mean he was a soundly founded guy

[00:20:52] but the fact of the matter is that's a truth if the law

[00:20:56] is breaking the law or the police break the law there is no law

[00:21:01] and so we need honorable people that hold those positions

[00:21:05] i mean if your sheriff doesn't understand this go meet with your sheriff

[00:21:09] and honestly i've i've had a number of meetings with our sheriff and

[00:21:12] and found him to be a reasonable kind of guy i mean he always he always

[00:21:16] hides behind the law i mean he does he will always say well i'm going to enforce

[00:21:20] the law okay so what's the law quote me chapter and verse i mean

[00:21:25] help me understand where you stand on this issue

[00:21:28] you're right people had to take sides and most of the time as you point out

[00:21:35] they rolled over to the establishment view which was again not

[00:21:38] scientifically sound and was not backed by the unconstitutional

[00:21:43] establishment view i might clarify that's that's correct

[00:21:47] okay so what most officers did now i'll i'll go back to

[00:21:51] i mean i'm all over the place of course sam in tanzania

[00:21:56] the the guy that was leading the country ended up being assassinated by the

[00:22:00] world leaders and he was not going to go along with any of the

[00:22:03] covid bravo seara they put a woman in there at the head of

[00:22:07] the country and she became a covid coward

[00:22:10] rabid enforcer and she's all to the map about the masks and everything like that

[00:22:17] the police officers said we're not going to wear the mask

[00:22:21] they took them off the people in the community said well if they're not wearing

[00:22:25] them we're not wearing them and tanzania had the lowest death

[00:22:31] per capita of any nation in the world i mean we had

[00:22:38] we were the worst in the world by 45 percent worse than anybody else

[00:22:43] iran was the second worst tanzania was the absolute

[00:22:47] safest place in the world to not get covid and they completely ignored it

[00:22:52] except in the airport i'll take that back because the

[00:22:54] the covid coward leader had a pretty iron grip on this on the airport

[00:22:58] but the general population said well the police aren't wearing them we're not

[00:23:03] and what needs to happen is the police need to realize

[00:23:06] they are us we are them i mean anything they do

[00:23:10] they're doing to their own children and grandchildren yeah you're right about that

[00:23:14] there's what should happen in these cases against donald trump in my opinion

[00:23:18] they all need to be dropped not because i think that donald trump is

[00:23:22] completely uh you know legitimate not but because i don't

[00:23:26] believe that these going straight to the supreme court and

[00:23:28] circumventing the process set up by the founders relating to congress

[00:23:32] if things occurred when he was president then we need to

[00:23:36] decide if we want to impeach they've already impeached donald twice

[00:23:40] the problem is that the senate took no action

[00:23:43] therefore it's doa and a story uh if we believe that it's worthy of taking

[00:23:48] action then the senate must take action on the impeachments handed over from

[00:23:52] the house and decide look we're gonna try this thing

[00:23:55] and convict if justifiable if you say well wait they they tried and

[00:23:59] convict it fine then are they going to remove him from office

[00:24:02] there's this process and all these court cases about donald

[00:24:06] are aimed to circumvent all this doctor and set up

[00:24:10] in my opinion a parallel betrayal is what i would call it

[00:24:14] well absolutely this is law fair as we call it oftentimes it's

[00:24:19] it's warfare against them for the political purpose

[00:24:23] the bimbo eruptions and everything else is all that same thing

[00:24:27] that's what hillary used to call them anyway we've got to take a hard break it

[00:24:30] sounds like yeah we'll do it and we'll come right back

[00:24:33] dr brellio continue to break it down then i got another bomb show the layout

[00:24:36] that he can respond to in mere seconds has to do with your right to privacy

[00:24:40] ladies and gentlemen is it absolutely gone it's because of these parallel

[00:24:44] processes set up where we circumvent the vertical and horizontal checks and

[00:24:47] balances hang tight protecting your liberties you're

[00:24:54] listening to liberty news radio usc news i'm ryan

[00:25:05] donald trump says he'll debate president biden anywhere

[00:25:08] anytime any place trump in a social media post suggested the two debate

[00:25:13] at an upcoming rally in michigan outside the courthouse in new york this

[00:25:17] weekend

[00:25:23] trumps challenge comes after president biden said in an interview with radio

[00:25:26] host howard stern that he would be willing to

[00:25:29] debate trump secretary of state antony blinkin meeting with arab leaders in

[00:25:33] saudi arabia mid the ongoing war in gaza and israeli foreign ministry

[00:25:37] official says blinkin will then visit israel tuesday has talked

[00:25:41] continue for a potential ceasefire and hostage release deal

[00:25:45] officials in oklahoma say at least four people are dead after a weekend

[00:25:50] tornado outbreak two were killed when a large twister hit the small town of

[00:25:54] holdenville about 60 miles southeast of oklahoma city

[00:25:57] governor kevin stitt toured several hard hit communities sunday calling the

[00:26:00] devastation unbelievable he also declared a state of emergency for a

[00:26:05] dozen counties sunday with reports of more than 30 tornadoes hitting the

[00:26:09] state there were still heavy rains damaging winds and possible tornadoes

[00:26:13] forecast in louisiana monday new biden administration pollution

[00:26:17] regulations will make it more expensive for energy companies to keep

[00:26:21] burning coal jen gelber has more the climate rule will require power

[00:26:25] companies to cut carbon dioxide emissions from coal power plants by

[00:26:29] 90 percent if they intend to operate past 2039 the epa also issued separate

[00:26:35] regulations governing coal plants hazardous air pollution wastewater and toxic ash waste

[00:26:41] president biden is praising a new labor agreement between the united auto workers

[00:26:46] and neimler the uw and the german truck manufacturer came to an agreement saturday

[00:26:51] that avoided a strike of 7 000 workers at a north carolina plant and some

[00:26:55] southern distribution centers this is usa news

[00:27:00] Greece is cheap but the airfare costs a fortune Paris not much closer and again

[00:27:05] airfare what about port de vallarta let's face it flying anywhere is just too

[00:27:09] expensive wait what's this low cost airlines with one call to low cost

[00:27:15] airlines you'll drastically slash your travel costs we're talking insanely

[00:27:19] low airline prices to any of your favorite destinations where would you

[00:27:23] like to go london rome

[00:27:25] Costa Rica Australia wow that's cheap so why wait call now to learn how crazy

[00:27:31] cheap it is to fly anywhere in the u.s or international our prices are so low

[00:27:36] we can't publish them the only way to get them is to call to instantly hear the

[00:27:40] most amazing best deals on airline travel it's that easy so call now and

[00:27:44] start packing 800 215 51 41 800 215 51 41 800 215 51 41

[00:27:55] that's 800 215 51 41

[00:28:26] preparedness begins with prepstartsnow.com

[00:28:29] former sheriff Richard Mack recounts in his book the proper role of law enforcement

[00:28:34] how he came to realize while working as a beat cop how wrong the all too common

[00:28:38] orientation of police officers is when they think of their job as being to

[00:28:42] write tickets and arrest people Richard Mack tells of his personal

[00:28:45] transformation from by the number cop to constitution conscious defender of

[00:28:49] citizen safety and freedoms learn what it really means to serve and

[00:28:53] protect purchase your copy at cspoa.org that cspoa.org

[00:29:01] the foundation for moral law is a non-profit legal foundation

[00:29:05] committed to protecting our unalienable right to publicly acknowledge god the

[00:29:09] foundation for moral law exists to restore the knowledge of god in law

[00:29:14] and government and to acknowledge and defend the truth that man is endowed

[00:29:18] with rights not by our fellow man but by god

[00:29:21] the foundation maintains a two-fold focus first litigation within state and

[00:29:26] federal courts second education conducting seminars to

[00:29:30] teach the necessity and importance of acknowledging god in law

[00:29:34] and government how can you help please make a tax deductible contribution

[00:29:38] allowing foundation attorneys to continue the fight you may also purchase

[00:29:42] various foundation products as well at morallaw.org

[00:29:45] located in montgomery alabama the foundation for moral law is a

[00:29:49] non-profit tax exempt 501c3 founded by judge roymor

[00:29:53] please partner with us to achieve this important mission morallaw.org

[00:30:08] okay so you know what we're doing is we're mixing apples and oranges or

[00:30:14] whatever you want to call it there's so many things

[00:30:18] that there's so much mud being thrown against the wall against donald

[00:30:21] trump that uh that some people are saying presidential

[00:30:25] immunity is involved in all of them but it's not trump would be claiming i fear

[00:30:30] that he had presidential immunity and in uh 1992 i mean i don't know i mean i

[00:30:36] don't know how far back he wants to go but there are some actions that happened

[00:30:39] before he became president some actions happened after he became president

[00:30:43] and they're they're mixing and matching and they really don't mix in the same

[00:30:47] pot come together very good right now well six months ago something like that

[00:30:54] i think it was the washington post came out says there's 88 charges against trump

[00:30:58] in uh four different cases there's 44 federal charges 44 state charges blah

[00:31:03] blah blah blah and they're trying to put them all

[00:31:06] in the same pot stir them up and it's really a bunch of bravo seara

[00:31:10] do it that way it's it's law fair trying to derail his candidacy

[00:31:14] but but the point of the matter is that that each one of them is different

[00:31:18] let's take the bimbo eruptions that uh that's what hillary clinton used to call

[00:31:24] them when they happened all the time with bill i mean we got this karen mcdougall

[00:31:29] that uh they what did they call her a playmate or something like that

[00:31:34] anyway she i mean what a demeaning i mean how

[00:31:37] these things women should say are you kidding me

[00:31:40] we are being categorized anyway that's another discussion i guess but so she

[00:31:45] claims there was this affair with donald trump and the stormy daniels claims the

[00:31:50] same thing there was supposedly some uh payments to keep everything hushed up

[00:31:55] and all that kind of stuff and and those are different they happened

[00:31:59] before trump became president and they had other words one discussion is

[00:32:04] president of the united states the other one is citizen

[00:32:08] and that's why we have to have different processes because citizens in the

[00:32:12] president of the united states have different processes in place per the

[00:32:15] supreme law right and then i mean there's there's a lot

[00:32:19] of muddy water on these bimbo eruptions um because you know there's people claiming

[00:32:25] it violates federal election laws which in i mean if you i don't

[00:32:31] have any idea how many thousands of times maybe every year

[00:32:36] people pay off somebody to say keep quiet about our affair

[00:32:40] and you can walk away with money i walk away with my reputation

[00:32:43] whatever but but the fact of the matter is um

[00:32:48] the it's a real strain to put it against election law when a guy took it out

[00:32:52] of a business account to pay off something else

[00:32:55] through an attorney it it's really a strain and that's a case we don't have

[00:32:59] time to try this morning but these other things that uh for

[00:33:04] example the one he was convicted on and needed to half a billion dollars to

[00:33:07] to put up as a as basically some extortion money in new york

[00:33:14] virtually all of those were if they existed were misdemeanors

[00:33:19] that happened when he was applying for loans there was no

[00:33:23] no banks said hey we will never do business again with donald trump everybody

[00:33:27] made money nobody complained and everybody said we were made whole

[00:33:32] yeah no victim on top of that on top of that

[00:33:36] they want to do business with him in the future but they were at best misdemeanors

[00:33:40] before and they've turned them into fed uh felonies and the reason they did that

[00:33:44] was so there wouldn't be a statute of limitations if something happened x y z

[00:33:48] years ago and it's a misdemeanor they say you know what it's it's beyond where

[00:33:53] we can do anything about it but if they make it a felony then

[00:33:56] there's not an expiration date so so anyway all of these things are being

[00:34:00] manipulated for political reasons but they're the big thing we

[00:34:05] started off talking today is about a presidential immunity thing

[00:34:09] and virtually none of them are related to presidential immunity

[00:34:13] i mean whether it's the bimbo eruptions or whether it's uh how they

[00:34:17] applied for loans and now now if president did something while he was

[00:34:21] president that's that might be questionable then we go through the

[00:34:24] process the process when he was president has to be

[00:34:28] followed before we can jump into these other arenas of criminal

[00:34:33] charges if he if they occurred when he was president

[00:34:36] before or after we can talk about and what they've done

[00:34:39] what they've done is hyper you know divided on this where you're either a

[00:34:43] hundred percent supportive of trump he has complete immunity no matter what

[00:34:46] and you're back or you just you're against trump 100% and that's the

[00:34:50] dishonest hegellian dialectic here my response isn't to attack or to

[00:34:54] defend trump my response is to teach the constitutional

[00:34:57] process when he was president and then separate those acts when he wasn't

[00:35:01] president to let them take the regular course of actions if somebody

[00:35:04] wants to sue trump for redress of grievance for wrongs done by all means

[00:35:08] let those cases stand on their own but let's not mix the two and play games

[00:35:12] if i was the supreme court justice what i would simply say is this

[00:35:15] you have no business being at the supreme court acts that are not

[00:35:19] presidential in nature can go on their own track in the courts per normal

[00:35:24] presidential questions must go through the congress congress already impeached

[00:35:27] twice uh and the senate's done nothing with it so

[00:35:30] hey we're going to point to the supreme law of the land for guidance on what

[00:35:33] congress should do if they have an issue with this

[00:35:36] and otherwise we're going to let the courts proceed as they may on

[00:35:39] non-presidential in other words citizen type cases

[00:35:43] or presidential cases must go through this route and i would basically

[00:35:47] point clarity uh to the people to all the quote lower courts

[00:35:51] and i would lay this if i was the supreme court justice that's what i

[00:35:54] would say doctor what do you think

[00:35:56] well you made an earlier statement that i agree with

[00:36:00] i kind of took it wrong to begin with when you said they

[00:36:04] should not be at the supreme court which you were taking it to say these things

[00:36:07] should not even be appealed at the supreme court that's correct

[00:36:10] i was you know so once i understood that i say okay fine

[00:36:14] but i took it another way to begin with and it was kind of a more aggressive

[00:36:17] approach that most of the people that are sitting on the bench in the supreme

[00:36:20] court now shouldn't be sitting there anyway well that's true

[00:36:24] find out they can't even define a woman for crying out loud

[00:36:27] and it's like that's right to find a woman no we can't do that

[00:36:30] this follow-up question should have been are you a woman

[00:36:34] i mean these these buffoons that do these kinds of things i mean we let them

[00:36:38] get away with and then of course i hate to even go

[00:36:42] maybe this is a segue into your next story

[00:36:45] but um but the fiza court appointees made by judge roberts

[00:36:50] without constitutional authority and the fiza courts off criminal and should

[00:36:53] be shut down also well they all the judges that

[00:36:57] sit there were appointed by judge roberts and there was no presidential

[00:37:02] appointment no congressional approval of it he just said

[00:37:06] hey guy you're in it for for what i think without authority i might add there's no

[00:37:10] provision anywhere in the the section in the supreme law the land with a

[00:37:13] court to define where you can just create your own weird sub court and

[00:37:17] appoint your people to it right well congress creates congress in article

[00:37:22] one section eight creates these sub courts but

[00:37:26] but there but there's a process you go through

[00:37:29] this defined constitutionally with appointment process and approval

[00:37:33] process there's checks and balances but to just give it you know create in

[00:37:37] 1978 the fiza court and then saying okay the supreme court chief justice gets to

[00:37:42] put the these judges in place and they i think they're a seven-year term if i

[00:37:46] recall correctly i think there's 11 judges

[00:37:49] and and and you know what they just it's a secret court

[00:37:53] there's no checker balance the fourth amendment is just

[00:37:57] gutted now with both the fiza 702 being reauthorized and with the patriot act

[00:38:03] out there and some of these national defense authorization acts and stuff that

[00:38:08] that uh that have been passed time and time again since 2001

[00:38:13] we have just gutted the fourth amendment just doesn't exist i mean

[00:38:18] in for all intents and purposes uh we should start

[00:38:23] reemphasizing that and and start regaining what traction we've lost there

[00:38:28] because of these unconstitutional criminal acts

[00:38:31] by both congress and the court system and the the executive carries them out

[00:38:36] it's it's bizarre anyway i don't know tam maybe

[00:38:40] maybe this uh trump thing we've we've thrashed it people should

[00:38:45] understand that it's a lot muddier water and

[00:38:48] they're muddying it up constantly it's muddy because people don't know the

[00:38:52] truth though and that's why i'm not i'm not attacking trump and i'm not

[00:38:55] defending trump i'm merely talking about look when he's president there's a

[00:38:59] process via congress impeachment and conviction um you know

[00:39:04] removal from office then if necessary uh trials

[00:39:08] there is already immunity in that process which normally a citizen just goes

[00:39:12] you know hey we're gonna do the due process and probable cause and trial

[00:39:17] all that is preempted by this immunity this extra protection

[00:39:21] that congress can provide to the president if justified

[00:39:24] if congress decides it's not justified and they impeach and they convict and

[00:39:27] they remove then the trial process starts

[00:39:30] they're mixing this up to where the american people don't know which way to

[00:39:32] look up or look down or whatever else some people are going let's go to war

[00:39:35] the process doesn't work well you're wrong the process works they've just

[00:39:38] circumvented it and we the people have allowed them to circumvent it

[00:39:42] and that is the quintessential problem now things that he's done

[00:39:45] that are outside of being president let's have the courts deal with them if

[00:39:48] they're misdemeanors you can't graduate them to felonies in the courts

[00:39:52] or in some other opinion or idea okay and so you say well they violate you know

[00:39:59] federal election law and my response to that is 90 percent of that federal

[00:40:02] election law is unconstitutional as well and so we just go right on down the

[00:40:07] list where we're so far as you point out doctor from the

[00:40:10] constitution that it's hard for people to find their way back

[00:40:13] and that's the real reason for this discussion is i want people to understand

[00:40:16] this isn't uh we're friends or we're hateful of donald trump

[00:40:20] this is a here's how the process works let's follow the process when we do

[00:40:24] it's grand when we don't it's disaster i mean to me that's the quintessential

[00:40:29] point doctor when the police break the law there

[00:40:32] is no law and that's kind of where we are right now

[00:40:35] in america amen to that go ahead and skip the break

[00:40:38] go ahead doctor sorry well with all the criminal acts by those that are

[00:40:42] currently sitting in office just because you got elected under syros'

[00:40:47] money to get to be a district attorney doesn't mean you can make your own law

[00:40:52] it's like our local police agencies that we talked to during the

[00:40:56] covid con tell me what you're gonna write on the

[00:40:59] ticket and and jack you're right most of the time they

[00:41:02] tried to circumvent it by saying well you're trespassing

[00:41:06] the hell you say i'm trespassing in a public school

[00:41:09] i mean come on my kid is enrolled in this school

[00:41:12] i mean come on either nobody's allowed to enter or everybody's allowed to enter you

[00:41:16] can't just single out people and call it trespass on a whim on what grounds is it

[00:41:20] trespass oh we came and harassed you and you wouldn't

[00:41:22] leave so now you're you know okay they're just backing into this where

[00:41:26] you're um you know if you violate the law everybody

[00:41:29] can be breakers of the law because who decides what the law is right

[00:41:34] here's the problem they try to bring it about all your resisting arrest or

[00:41:39] you're not obeying a lawful order let's do the lawful order thing for a minute

[00:41:43] i've been down the road i've made multiple presentations to military

[00:41:47] organizations in regards to the requirement to obey lawful orders

[00:41:53] but the complete legality of disobeying

[00:41:56] unlawful orders okay and now of course the oath of office or the oath of

[00:42:02] enlistment that i took 55 years ago um is different now i mean they've

[00:42:08] they've been we do that around it too but the fact of the matter is

[00:42:12] there's a lot of of military commanders that are absolutely determined that

[00:42:18] whatever they say is a legal lawful order far too many police

[00:42:23] are in that realm today that anything they do is a legal lawful order and if

[00:42:28] you don't obey it then you can arrest you

[00:42:30] for not following uh the direction of the yeah they're drunk with powers the

[00:42:35] problem they they are and a big part of that problem needs to be addressed to

[00:42:39] and again i'm all over the chart with this thing but this idea you are because

[00:42:43] there's so many principles and so many things that the founders taught and

[00:42:46] that were clear back in the day that have been lost and perverted and

[00:42:50] manipulated to where people don't know which way to look and that's the

[00:42:53] reason that i bring this up ladies and gentlemen

[00:42:56] have you seen billy jack the 1971 film yeah it's an american action drama

[00:43:02] film and it's two or the second of four films related to that very

[00:43:06] topic but anyway i wanted to mention that if you didn't see it that's the details

[00:43:09] of it look it up check it out and you can watch billy jack

[00:43:12] now jim jordan and others are asking the question are we china now

[00:43:17] representative jordan highlights potential and this is the

[00:43:22] interesting thing potential collusion to investigate

[00:43:25] maga supporters the stories in the western journal it's a great article

[00:43:29] what happened to my right to privacy is the question on everybody's mind but

[00:43:33] joe biden has secretly brought china's social credit

[00:43:37] score system to the usa in a stealth effort to eliminate the free speech

[00:43:43] rights and gun rights of conservatives and they say jim jordan is

[00:43:48] seriously incensed about it he's mad about it

[00:43:52] he's furious over our you know freedoms in this regard

[00:43:56] and my response is to jim jordan you always play games

[00:44:01] okay i'm concerned about this and before we get into the details of this

[00:44:05] you know issue about how china works and how they're bringing this credit score

[00:44:08] system to the united states i want to highlight this listen carefully

[00:44:14] jordan highlights quote potential collusion well wait a minute it's either

[00:44:19] collusion or it's not it's not potential

[00:44:21] jim okay you need to investigate and get to the bottom of it

[00:44:24] and if it is collusion you need to call it collusion and if it's not then you need

[00:44:28] to let it go what they do is they use these words

[00:44:32] to always have jim jordan standing for your rights supposedly he's incensed he's

[00:44:36] furious he's angry to appease the one side whereas the other side

[00:44:40] always you know it's always potential so see you can't charge potential collusion

[00:44:45] that means well we're looking into it we think there might be probable cause

[00:44:48] for collusion but it's potential in in the sense that there's evidence here

[00:44:51] but not enough to prosecute her we haven't put out got all our ducks in the

[00:44:54] road for prosecution this is the way they always you know they always bring it

[00:44:58] right to the line to make everybody incensed but never

[00:45:01] enough to create actionable uh prosecutions and that's the first problem

[00:45:06] that i'm seeing with this doctor well talk is cheap

[00:45:11] you know and what all has said then when all is said and done

[00:45:15] more is said than done that's kind of the arena we're in right now

[00:45:19] and and i i agree with you we have a lot of stirring but not a lot of

[00:45:24] cooking going on and i'm very frustrated with it also

[00:45:28] but but this idea of of collusion and this idea of social credit scores and

[00:45:35] everything it's interesting how different states are approaching this

[00:45:39] utah seems to be on the bleeding edge of this thing

[00:45:42] we're doing facial recognition things and dossiers and

[00:45:47] sharing of of you know information that should be kept private like

[00:45:52] you know you you go through government agencies and

[00:45:55] they you know they say they oh we've got a group that looks at this yeah they

[00:45:58] look at it they make sure they're offending up to the very degree they

[00:46:02] possibly can your privacy and utah is probably one of

[00:46:07] the leading states in in how they do this where they share

[00:46:10] driver license information and things like that for

[00:46:14] all sorts of matters and and the facial recognition stuff they've

[00:46:19] authorized and it's just appalling to me we're

[00:46:23] moving to this direction of you know you talk about the credit scores in

[00:46:26] china and how if you don't have a socially acceptable position

[00:46:30] let's say you're not for diversity equity and inclusion

[00:46:35] well you're you're just not going to have an ability to get a bank loan or

[00:46:39] maybe to do to expand your business or

[00:46:41] maybe you might be found to be maybe in violation of an

[00:46:46] affirmative action equal opportunity process

[00:46:49] uh maybe you want to be able to talk on the radio i don't know

[00:46:52] i don't know where this is going but that's where it is in china

[00:46:55] and they do uh score you based upon how well you conform

[00:47:00] to their establishment viewpoint and the united states is moving that

[00:47:04] direction whether whether biden's doing it this

[00:47:07] second or not i don't know and jim jordan needs to investigate it

[00:47:11] we need to get to the bottom of it but but uh but i'm very concerned that that

[00:47:17] seems to be the foregone conclusion to where we're going to end up and

[00:47:21] that's a bad place pre-societies don't keep dossiers on their citizens they

[00:47:26] just don't that's that's gestapo that stasi

[00:47:29] that's kgb i mean those secret police kinds of things

[00:47:34] they keep the dossiers we are capable now with the

[00:47:39] uh this thing in draper utah that they basically keep track of every text

[00:47:44] message and email and and every originating phone

[00:47:47] call and everything like that they've got this huge crunching capability to be

[00:47:52] able to put together a matrix of everything that happens in your life

[00:47:56] yeah you're right about that it's the chinese based system that's used the

[00:48:02] social credit score system is a way to keep the citizens in line

[00:48:08] it grades them individually for how well they keep the

[00:48:12] party's aggressive rules as the communists right they're bringing that to

[00:48:16] america and so this system gives chinese scores that allows

[00:48:20] them to access restaurants and banks and everything else

[00:48:23] the more you behave the higher your score the less you behave

[00:48:27] and it can fluctuate okay social score can move up and down just like a

[00:48:31] credit score based on your behavior how compliant you are

[00:48:34] the system also elicits the participation of others to rate you so

[00:48:39] it's a spiral in each other system combined with a rules system set up in

[00:48:44] the communist world of china it's based on the communist rules you violate the

[00:48:47] communist party rules and you're in trouble uh you keep those rules or obey

[00:48:50] those rules now if you're kind of obstinate they can ratchet you down

[00:48:54] not let you have banking not let you have entertainment not let you travel

[00:48:58] and if you uh you know obey the rules then you get back more of your life

[00:49:02] these scores are also set up so that people can report companies too it's

[00:49:07] the companies get scores not just individuals that way they control

[00:49:10] companies either that company has access in the global marketplace or it

[00:49:14] doesn't or uh they have the ability to um you know

[00:49:17] so a lot of the conservatives and and gun dealers they lost their right to

[00:49:23] charge credit cards okay well this is what we're talking about

[00:49:26] the system is live and well in america naturally corresponding with the bank

[00:49:32] scores the system rewards people for doing what the government wants them to

[00:49:35] do and they can control every move you make this way

[00:49:38] they're rating companies and individuals now you think it's coming to a theater

[00:49:42] near you it's already here there's already been over the last several

[00:49:45] years a lot of people kicked out shadow band shut down by the quote private

[00:49:50] sector the the the new media companies the social

[00:49:53] media companies but they're really in bed with the government doing the same

[00:49:55] thing banks are doing it it goes on and on to the point

[00:49:59] where this is disaster now i appreciate jim jordan being incensed about it

[00:50:04] but jim just says oh we have potential collusion well as long as you leave that

[00:50:08] in the potential stage no actions can be taken against these clowns

[00:50:12] so when you wonder why we can't get to the bottom of this or why we can't do

[00:50:15] something to solve this it's all based on how jim jordan and those guys

[00:50:18] are calling it potential well congress has been just as guilty

[00:50:22] of abusing us on this as the president so i appreciate jim jordan

[00:50:25] digging into it and him releasing facts and information but as long as he

[00:50:29] calls it potential collusion he's almost playing a role in making sure that it

[00:50:34] that it doesn't go criminal where we can prosecute doctor

[00:50:38] well it's almost like admit to it and then bury it up or release enough

[00:50:41] information to to let people know about what happened but not enough to

[00:50:44] prosecute him it's almost like it's intentional

[00:50:48] well congress yeah it is intentional but if it happens in

[00:50:52] in uh politics they almost intend to let i don't know jim jordan is

[00:50:56] intentionally doing this or if he's trying to do right

[00:50:59] uh i don't know where that lies but no doubt this credit score of this abuse

[00:51:02] is being imported from the communists and it's not it's not coming

[00:51:06] it's already here doctor and it's already being applied against people like me

[00:51:10] and you well absolutely i mean congress needs to clean

[00:51:13] up their act before they maybe look at somebody else's the

[00:51:17] the beam in their eye versus the moat but absolutely congress has control

[00:51:21] of this congress passed the usa patriot act

[00:51:25] if i understand correctly only one member of congress read it before it was

[00:51:28] passed only one back in 2001 i read it personally

[00:51:33] and we've talked about this before i have testified against it before the

[00:51:37] senate judiciary committee it is an abominable act

[00:51:40] that destroys the fourth amendment virtually i mean

[00:51:44] it's gone as we said before so the the congress traded

[00:51:48] that patriot act and it was on the shelf before 9 11 2001 happened

[00:51:55] they had it ready and those colluders if you will in congress helped

[00:52:00] ramrod it through by huge margins and so that is set up a thing oh i'll just

[00:52:05] give an example after that was put into place we had a fire at our house one of

[00:52:09] my daughters uh was cooking in the

[00:52:14] kitchen and started the kitchen on fire this is

[00:52:17] she got distracted by one of her kids and so

[00:52:22] you know we had an insurance thing in the the deposit that and the insurance

[00:52:26] money was larger than my normal deposits by a substantial amount

[00:52:31] i got interrogated by the bank management because

[00:52:36] the bank is required to report anomalies in banking

[00:52:42] okay so that kind of stuff happened to me okay i had a reasonable excuse my

[00:52:47] house tried to burn down and we got an insurance settlement

[00:52:50] okay so but that but that's just one example the banks are required to do

[00:52:54] this the telecommunications people are required to report

[00:52:58] to this nsa thing this group that crunches all the numbers

[00:53:01] all of the metadata on that uh we we do things like

[00:53:06] when we let's just take my being banned from

[00:53:10] from youtube uh we were not towing the line according to the

[00:53:15] establishment viewpoint we didn't we didn't speak in

[00:53:18] hushed and odd tones about the cove at cowardice and the jab and the

[00:53:23] and the unscientific approach and all this kind of stuff

[00:53:26] we were blatant and in their face youtube banned me that was in collusion i

[00:53:31] believe and how would i prove it well i'd have to go to court i don't have the

[00:53:34] money to do that but i believe it was in response to what the establishment

[00:53:37] wanted and it was government directed under both trump

[00:53:41] and biden so all of these kinds of things are currently in effect i've

[00:53:47] personally been affected by them i know where their quote on quote

[00:53:51] authorities coming from congress was the one that created it

[00:53:55] it's bad all the way around and congress needs to clean up their act

[00:54:01] there you have it we're flat out of time i wish we had more because this is so

[00:54:04] valuable but i really wanted to break down so these processes for people from

[00:54:08] a constitutional point of view so you understand

[00:54:11] you know what joe biden should be impeached on bringing these commonest

[00:54:14] scores these social credit scores to america but look congress is all aboard

[00:54:18] for it government's all up and down the line are doing it and it's not

[00:54:21] thought about coming to america or it might come to america it's already here

[00:54:26] in big big bold abusive hostile commonest

[00:54:30] ways and we the people better wise up and stop it by our greater numbers

[00:54:34] and we better do it peacefully the supreme law of the land

[00:54:37] is the way back folks for dr scott bradley freedomsizing

[00:54:41] sunday com and yours truly we declare we the people

[00:54:45] along with the grace the almighty we can save america

[00:54:48] we need god to save the rip