Radio Show Hour 1 – 06/14/2024

[00:00:13] Live from atop the Rocky Mountains, the crossroads of the West. You are listening to the Liberty Roundtable Radio Talk Show. All right. Happy to have you along my fellow Americans. Sam Bushman live on your radio. Hard hitting news. The network refused to use. No doubt starts now.

[00:00:34] This is my fellow Americans is the broadcast for June 14th and the year of our Lord 2024. This is our one of two and the goal always to protect life, liberty and property and to promote God, family and country on your radio in the traditions of our founding fathers.

[00:00:49] Yes, indeed, we use the blueprint for liberty, the Supreme Law, the land, the Constitution for the United States of America. That is our guide. We reject revolution unless it's a Jesus revolution. Then we're in because we follow the Prince of Peace.

[00:01:00] And as you know, the checks and balances brilliantly put in place by the founding fathers. What are the peaceful restorative solutions we still have at our fingertips? It is a freedom loving, fantastic faith filled. We're taking America back one heart, one mind, one issue at a time Friday.

[00:01:15] So we got two hours of hard hitting talk. And the good news is the doctors in the house, Dr. Scott Bradley, founder and chairman of the Constitution Commemoration Foundation and the author of the book and DVD lecture series

[00:01:29] to preserve the nation in the traditions of our founding fathers. Freedoms Rising Sun Dotcom, his website, check out his weekly webinars and more. That's freedoms rising sun dot com. Dr. Bradley, welcome, sir. Well, how are you doing, Sam? I'm doing fantastic, my friend. You're in good voice today.

[00:01:47] Hey, isn't today Flag Day? No, I mean, I I'm flying, of course, my original U.S. flag, 13 stars and stripes in the circular. And that a racist flag, doctor? Yeah, you know, people have I've accused. I mean, all sorts of lines of people have lied.

[00:02:08] Absolutely. And play games with it. Why? It's a Christian flag, is it not? Yeah, well, it is. I mean, well, actually, the United States approved it. And so the I mean, it was a but it was really designed to highlight Christianity as well.

[00:02:25] And that's what it represented a Christian nation, right? Right. I mean, but other people are welcome here, too, of course. But sure, the fact of the matter is, you know, he's all about. If you like to worship your God, you're welcome here.

[00:02:38] Of course, if you're trying, as Jefferson so eloquently stated, if we get a long discussion about this, I'll tell you what he said about people use these as an excuse, religious fervor that is in fact wrong and destructive. I mean, you know, this idea of mercy, not mercy.

[00:03:01] What do they call them? Honor killings and, you know, things like that. Those those things absolutely are pretending that God gives you the right to murder when we know it's our right and commandments of God. Absolutely. Yeah. And they found their basis anyway.

[00:03:16] You know, we're probably getting far field. Today is not only Flag Day, but look, there's a group called this day of history dot com, and they brought out the June 14th, 1954. America becomes a nation under God. And so that's when they added that the pledge in 1954, June 14th.

[00:03:39] So, you know, it's this day in history, if you will, doctor. You know, a lot of people don't know the origins of the pledge. It started with the Bellamy brothers back in the 1890s, not the music guys. OK, you're a music guy.

[00:03:51] I was about to be like, no, no, no, it wasn't those guys. But they were they were world socialists, and it was a pledge to the world socialist organization. They used a Nazi salute, you know, this straight arm out in front of you

[00:04:07] salute originally, and there was an effort to build a globalist kind of a new world order society. And over the years, people that have been loyal to the nation have tried to, you know, modify it and adjust it and everything like that.

[00:04:25] Like you say here back in the 1950s, they put under God in there. That was when it was legislatively included. But but the fact is, it started out really whacked. And by the 1930s, the Nazi salute had kind of been recognized as another symbol.

[00:04:45] So they lost that when it came to that. But they used to salute the flag with a Nazi salute, if you could imagine that. So, yeah, it's it's weird, man. Just really weird. Well, you got to ask yourself, what is Flag Day and should we celebrate it?

[00:05:01] Well, you know, I I hear all of the. You know, the sensitivities that people have and some people even call it almost an idol. It's a symbol. But I believe it was back in, I'm thinking, 1989. The Supreme Court ruled that you could burn it if you wanted.

[00:05:20] And it was a First Amendment kind of right to do. By the way, there's some efforts to make it illegal to burn a pride flag. Can you imagine that you can burn the United States flag, but you can't burn a pride flag in some areas now.

[00:05:34] I suppose those will all be challenged in court. But the but the fact of the matter is these some of these symbols become pretty divisive and. Yes, they do. So here's the question. Do you think people should have the right to burn the flag? Yeah.

[00:05:51] So I'm not I mean, it's almost easy. You're not a good American. Well, no, no, no. It's not something we advocate doing. We just celebrate your right to do it because it's just a piece of cloth. And if you don't believe in those, that symbolism or you believe

[00:06:04] your burning of the flag symbolizes, you know, your rejection of socialism or whatever reasons you have, we may not agree that you should do it, but we agree that you have the right to do it is kind of the point.

[00:06:16] And when we say happy Flag Day, that's good. What is Flag Day? I mean, it's just a day that started out as a socialist day over time, it's kind of morphed and been kind of modified into a what national holiday in America and all this kind of stuff.

[00:06:31] And they added one nation under God later in 1954 for that. And it's got a sordid history. The question then is, should we celebrate it? Yeah, I believe that. I mean, like I say, I've got my 1776 flag flying today.

[00:06:48] I think that the principles that were the basis of that, you know, the Declaration of Independence and all that kind of stuff. It was pretty. Yeah, I think that there was some pretty sound stuff going on there. But there's been lots of symbolic things.

[00:07:02] I mean, I know Alito for in the Supreme Court. He's kind of had his head in a ringer because of some flags they've flown an appeal to heaven. The one that has the I guess his wife was flying the flag

[00:07:13] and they literally slaughtered her as a racist, right? Well, that's true. But the appeal to heaven. I mean, that was 1775 for crying out loud. George Washington flew that flag over his headquarters. I mean, these these things are bad people.

[00:07:29] I don't know exactly the dates, but over the last decade or two, we've had a bunch of run ins about the Don't Tread on Me rattlesnake one. People call it racist and everything. That's all revolutionary war era. I mean, it's and they say, well, well, yeah, but supremacists.

[00:07:47] Well, it was resurrected to celebrate states rights also. Correct? Well, sure. But you know, there's symbolism is something that is always going to be out there. And this idea of trying to how shall we say, someone that you people down every single stinking thing?

[00:08:06] I mean, you know, as you know, we got deplatformed for speaking the truth about the COVID con that was going on four years ago. Continues even, by the way, I got a text message this morning about it. They're coming out with the bird flu

[00:08:22] vaccine and everybody's going to be rushing down, rolling up their sleeve. You know, it is so amazing to me, baby. Telling you that right now, not me, buddy. You know what? It's interesting to me. People say, well, you're anti-vax. Well, they're inherently dangerous. Oh, you're anti-vax. No, no.

[00:08:39] That's what it says. And what you mean by anti-vax? I'm not anti-vax. I realize it exists and I realize some people choose to do it and they have every right to do so just as much as I have every right to not do so.

[00:08:50] Well, that's the thing in 1980. Well, in 1986, Congress passed and Ronald Reagan signed that blanket of what shall we say, protective order, the vaccine injury compensation fund, right? Right. So so the general government, federal government pays for anybody that gets damaged.

[00:09:12] Well, the the inherent thing they state is vaccines are inherently dangerous. Yeah. And and they know that they admit it. And they they force the taxpayers to pay for whatever it goes wrong and take the liability away from these companies that continue in the vaccine arena.

[00:09:30] It's a disgrace. Some people are saying, no, we need to hang the flag upside down, showing distress for the nation. Well, and that has been an international symbol for years and years. Now, Alito's wife went upside down.

[00:09:43] Yeah. And and the fact of the matter is it's not illegal. I mean, everybody said, well, it's an illegal way to fly it. No, no, no, no. If you can burn the flag, you can fly it up. I mean, illegal way to fly it.

[00:09:54] Who decides how the legal way to play it is? That's just what the the lame brain clowns media were. Yeah, that's what they were saying. But and that's what these people that were trying to hang Alito and his family out to dry were saying that all of this

[00:10:10] the only reason I made up stuff forefront is because it's Alito. Supreme Court justice. But his wife doesn't lose her rights anyway. Right. Like, well, there's no question. But what if he had put it up? So he can do whatever he wants.

[00:10:23] Yes. So what loses rights because he's a Supreme Court justice, does he? Nope. And the fact of the matter is that there is no law. The state such. There is no law at a stage such.

[00:10:36] And the fact is, I mean, I look at some of these people, they put Che Guevara's picture on it or something. I mean, I don't think I've ever seen a real Che Guevara, but I'm I'm just saying that some people will have an overimprint on the flag.

[00:10:50] Yeah, put something on there and they say, you know, I'm celebrating Che or whatever. And it's a it's not the American flag. It's not the United States flag. There is a defined United States flag is defined in Title

[00:11:04] Four of the the code and the idea that a gold fringe just makes it prettier. That is not a United States flag. I mean, the people that put that on are defacing the flag. Everybody's as much as putting Che Guevara's picture on it.

[00:11:19] They are. And I have a problem with that. And up from a personal level, I don't think that's good to do. I don't like to denigrate. But at the same time, I support their right to do it if that's what they choose.

[00:11:28] Now, some people say I won't fly the flag. I hate the flag. It has socialist origins from the beginning. Yeah, it kind of went right there for a little while. And in 1954, we said one nation under God. But you know what? We're only one nation under God.

[00:11:41] If we keep God's commandments, otherwise, we're a split nation turning our back on God. And so some people say they won't fly the flag because they believe that it's a symbol of a nation in decline. What do you say to that?

[00:11:53] There's a lot of people that can have opinions and everybody's. I mean, I say opinions are like noses. Virtually everybody has one. But the fact of the matter is that it is a symbol of the nation. And that's all it is as a symbol.

[00:12:06] But it should be a U-19 rather than a divisive thing. There's people that fly stripes going different ways. And what's interesting with a lot of those is that that was a maritime flag at one point that,

[00:12:23] you know, a lot of these people that are sovereign citizens and so on fly the the flag with different directions, stripes and everything. It's it was a signal flag previously used, you know, at sea. And so there's there's a whole history of flags

[00:12:40] and war and everything else. Right. Yeah. People people make adoptions and adaptions and make opinions. And some people even, you know, have a blue stripe on their flag for they support the police and so on. You know, there's just a whole bunch of ways

[00:12:57] we can divide ourselves and ultimately be. And then the other issue is sometimes people just say, hey, you know, I don't want to pledge allegiance to the flag. So they take a knee. Right. Right. Uh huh. And then it goes another battle.

[00:13:11] Hey, we're going to try to force people to, you know, pledge allegiance never expect for the flag in the NFL or whatever. And, you know, when does it become kind of a force thing? You're forced to celebrate or promote the flag or, you know, hey,

[00:13:23] can you monopolize all of TV and everything else to oppose it and reject it? And, you know, the problem that we're getting with that is it's starting to turn into kind of a collective. The collective is going to decide what individuals can do or can't do

[00:13:35] without any evidence or law. It's insanity. Well, it is. And I think that, you know, it's kind of like um, let's just take these groups of police that do Pride Week or one through year or whatever the heck they do.

[00:13:51] It's you know, they get one day that we do the Memorial Day for all those that have been killed in war and a whole month we do about a made up sexual kind of thing at any rate. I mean, it's just weird.

[00:14:03] But but I think that the police by flying the pride flag or a city that flies a pride flag, they're divisive. It's a socially divisive kind of thing. And and they're basically tamping down our throat. A belief system.

[00:14:19] And it becomes, by the way, a false belief system, though. Let's be clear. God created male and female. Science backs that reality. And any blending or perversion of that is really turning our back on God as a nation. Right.

[00:14:32] So they're mandating turning your back on God in a sense. It's embedded in our DNA. You can't just say, you know, I said, why? I identify as a millionaire or a billionaire or a bazillionaire. Whatever it is, it doesn't care.

[00:14:46] Well, don't say that the direst will come after you and you'll owe a bunch of money. They'd have a hard time finding two nickels to rub together. But the fact of the matter is the fact of the matter is you can identify with whatever you want.

[00:14:59] The death doesn't mean it's fact that we live a day of delusion. We live in a day of delusion. And all of this is divisiveness is an attempt. I think we talk about it a lot about the Marxist. The communists are always trying to divide and conquer

[00:15:14] and that they can fractionalize us and put all these, you know, earthquakes in our way until all the ground is shook up and we're on a soundy foundation. We're more easily unseated as a nation. But you got that right. And that's what's happening big time.

[00:15:28] Headlines says Joe claims he will not pardon his son, Hunter. Right. But then the next statement says this. Commuting Hunter's sentence could be an option for the Biden White House. Press secretary doesn't rule it out. Rob Quinn, news or dot com with that.

[00:15:47] So help people understand the difference between a pardon and a commuting of a sentence. There's a big difference that people need to understand. What what Joe wants to do is do his son a favor, but not get in political trouble over it before the election

[00:16:02] is what's happening right here. So it's kind of nuanced, but there is a difference between the terms, doctor. Well, the fact of the matter is that they can set aside a conviction. But the fact of the matter also is he can pardon. I don't think he'll pardon him.

[00:16:14] I think there's too much blowback he's going to get for doing that. I think that that it would all that would inflame the electorate. And I think that he well, OK, Joe, probably go commute the sentence. No, because the pardon says, hey, you're off, you're dismissed.

[00:16:30] There's nothing to this. Right. OK, committing the sentence basically says, hey, we'll either reduce the penalties or, you know, we'll do things to soften the blow. But yet you're still guilty kind of thing. It's suspended and they're not going to have full.

[00:16:43] I don't want to say retribution, but full accountability for it. It's short of a pardon is the point he may do that. Where this goes, I don't really know at this point now. Right now, Hunter says he's going to appeal.

[00:16:54] So we'll have to wait for that to all happen. Very interesting, though. Well, and we could spend quite a bit of time on this thing. But but it was unquestionable that he violated a law that probably should not be there to begin with.

[00:17:06] OK, now we could talk about that at great length. The the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms approval process requires you to declare whether you're using drugs and which I have a problem with. OK, so so that's a bad law.

[00:17:21] OK, so I've been saying that I think what Donald Trump basically said, hey, don't worry, Joe, I've got your son. I'll take care of your son. And if I was Donald Trump, I would run on the campaign trail big time. I'm going to I'm going to basically pardon

[00:17:36] Hunter Biden over this gun crime and these drug crimes, because look, they're not federal crimes at all, whether you like or dislike Hunter. The fact is there should be no gun laws restricting him to have a right to keep and bear arms.

[00:17:50] And so I would dismiss these claims now. Do I think Hunter's guilty of other things? Absolutely. Do I think Joe's guilty of other things? Absolutely. But I would dismiss these two charges, the tax charge against him that he's going to go fight in California or something coming up

[00:18:04] and the gun charge. I would dismiss both of them. I think the IRS is IRS is a clown showing we should be shut it down. And I think that these gun laws are a violation of the Constitution, which means they need to be shut down.

[00:18:16] I would let Hunter off on both of those, and I would pardon him from both of them until the clown courts to stop it. And then I would basically let real charges, real felony charges move forward. And what they're doing now is using clown show charges

[00:18:29] and really denying the focus on the real criminal activity by Hunter. So I would basically run around if I was running for president and say, I'm ready to pardon Hunter on both of these. And here's why. What do you say to that, doctor?

[00:18:40] Well, I think that there's a solid logic there. But I would carry it a step forward, Sam. I mean, and this is going to sound really weird. But I think to make it really valid, if I was

[00:18:52] if I was Donald Trump and I was going to pardon Joe or Hunter, I'd say Freudian slip, right? Joe needs to be pardoned. Both of us for that matter. Maybe. But at any rate that well, I don't know. There's been some heinous crimes that have been committed

[00:19:08] while in office and so on. So they all the things they're going to bring up, though, would be pardonable. I just dismiss all of them because they always bring up things that, in my opinion, validate things that don't constitutionally hold. Water is the problem.

[00:19:18] The real criminal activity, they said they seem to just ignore in the deep state. But anyway, go ahead. You would take it a step further. Well, yeah, the right of the people to keep bear arms shall not be infringed.

[00:19:29] Well, this whole filling out the form and getting approval for Mother May I kind of stuff unconstitutional. But what I would do if I were Don or Donald, I don't know, do you want to be that formal? I would pardon every single person

[00:19:45] that has been convicted under such charges. That would make a statement. I would say that, see, on December 25th, 1868, President Johnson pardoned in order to to take out the stigma that was created by the 14th Amendment. And you're talking about Andrew Johnson, right?

[00:20:07] Yeah. Disenfranchised all of the guys that were participating in the in the effort to make the southern states an independent nation. So anyway, he had to pardon them so that they wouldn't be disenfranchised and could no longer participate in the governance of the nation

[00:20:25] since they were back in, you know, and and there's a whole long story about that whole thing. But he gave a blanket pardon. And if, in fact, the Donald was going to say, oh, no, I'm going to

[00:20:36] I'm going to put Hunter on this pedestal and I'll pardon him. I think it ought to be a blanket universal pardoning of all people that have been convicted under these unconstitutional actions. Amen. OK, then you now have a basis to say, I wouldn't say that.

[00:20:54] I'd say that's bringing the nation back to its founding principles. I love it to its senses. Sure. But so then they could say, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. We can't do all of that. They said they changed the law. The law is a bad law, too.

[00:21:07] And so anyway, I think you're on sound constitutional grounds if you do that. If if Hunter is pardoned and it's could the Donald pardon all the tax people, too. Well, here's the deal. See, initially, I think it was some months ago. I don't remember exactly.

[00:21:25] Defying the IRS some months ago. They came to this sweetheart negotiation with the DOJ Department of Justice, not much justice there where they were going to do. They plea bargained these charges, these tax charges dating back to 2017, 2018, this handgun purchase. Twenty eighteen, this addiction stuff anyway.

[00:21:49] And by the way, the addiction things this war on drugs has filled our incarceration. That's right. But OK, so anyway, all this stuff with Hunter has been brewing for, you know, six, seven years. And and finally, they've got a conviction and really the law specifically says right now

[00:22:12] that what what Hunter did was illegal with the guns. But what they tried to do was was plea bargain this thing down to like two misdemeanor charges on tax stuff and that if he abided by the, you know, the agreement that they made,

[00:22:30] they would dismiss the gun thing. Well, that was reviewed and says, no, wait, wait, wait. Everybody else has to be hung out to dry. And so they actually went to trial with them. The trial found, according to what the law reads right now,

[00:22:43] which I believe is an unconstitutional law, according to what the law reads right now, Hunter did that. And Hunter faces right now with that conviction of those three charges on the gun twenty five years. But then you won't get any time.

[00:22:58] Well, they're going to say, you know, he's a first time offender. Really? His first time he got caught. But at any rate, I mean, but the fact of the matter is then they're going to go to trial in California on these tax things.

[00:23:09] And he faces, I think, 17 years there, too. I say dismiss them both. Just go ahead and do some both. And I agree with you for everybody. Yeah, I think it's sooner. The Trump could make a big, big state, but that's people are going to go, what the heck?

[00:23:25] And then we got to rethink it. Well, you got that right. It's a big old battle. That's for sure. And I don't know what's going to happen to Joe or Hunter. But I will say this. I would pardon Hunter Biden. And I agree with Dr.

[00:23:41] Bradley, everybody of these false unconstitutional gun charges and these false unconstitutional tax supposed voluntary tax system that's mandated and putting people in jail everywhere and everything else. And I would campaign on that deal. So listen up, Donald and, you know, administration,

[00:24:02] whatever you want to call, you know, election team, whatever that is, one of the greatest ways you can gain the upper hand here and really, really highlight. I'm telling you right now, all the blacks, all the, you know,

[00:24:14] other different segments of society that feel like they're wrongfully put in prison for all kind of things. I would take people out of the prison for all the drug stuff because the war on drugs is a failure. You could literally free so many people

[00:24:28] and stand with the Supreme Law, the land really highlighting a difference between Don Don John and Joe. Right. All right. We're going to talk about what Joe Biden's doing while all this is going on. We'll do it in seconds on your radio. Proclaiming liberty across the land.

[00:24:55] You're listening to Liberty News Radio. USA News, I'm Ryan Daniels. The U.S. Supreme Court is upholding Americans access to the abortion pill, Mifepristone. Justices on the conservative majority court issued a ruling Thursday, which rejected a case brought by a group of anti-abortion doctors

[00:25:19] who challenged the FDA's actions to make the pill more available. In their decision, justices affirm the case had no standing before the high court. The ruling means Mifepristone pills can now be mailed to patients without an in-person doctor's visit. Former President Trump was back in D.C.

[00:25:37] His first time in the Capitol since losing the 2020 election. USA's John Schaeffer with details. The former president was meeting with Republican lawmakers, and he told reporters that President Biden is not the right person for the job. We're a nation that is being left at all over the world.

[00:25:53] We have a leader that's being left at all over the world. Trump said that Republicans are united in that he expects to reclaim the White House in November. He emphasized his plans to bring common sense back to the government

[00:26:04] and secure the southern border if he wins the election. Trump met with both House and Senate Republicans. President Biden expressing his pride in his son, Hunter, while speaking alongside the Ukrainian president at the G7 summit in Italy, Biden said Thursday. He has overcome an addiction.

[00:26:21] He is one of the brightest, most decent men I know. This marked Biden's first public comments following Hunter Biden's conviction on federal firearm charges. The president reiterated he would not pardon his son and addressed earlier questions about possibly commuting his sentence, firmly stating no.

[00:26:39] The United States is investing $60 billion in global infrastructure. The announcement coincides with President Biden's appearance alongside G7 leaders in Italy. Additionally, the U.S. and its allies have agreed on a plan to provide Ukraine with a $50 billion loan for defense and reconstruction. This is USA News.

[00:27:00] Omaha Steaks is rewriting the book on burgers with an all new handmade texture for the juiciest home style burgers you've ever tasted. Their pure ground burgers are made from single cuts of real aged Omaha steaks. These are truly steaks on a bun filet mignon, rib eye,

[00:27:17] New York strip, sirloin and even brisket burgers. Now is the time to experience the exclusive burger perfection flight for just $79.99. Go to Omaha Steaks dot com and use promo code TREAT at checkout to get an extra $20 off your order plus free shipping.

[00:27:35] You'll get four of each pure ground burgers so you can sample all the steak on a bun greatness. These burgers are crafted for a juicier, more tender experience, making your mouth water with every single bite. Don't wait. Go to Omaha Steaks dot com.

[00:27:49] Use promo code TREAT at checkout and get $20 off the burger perfection flight and discover your new burger obsession. Minimum order may be required. Former sheriff Richard Mack recounts in his book the proper role of law enforcement, how he came to realize

[00:28:06] while working as a beat cop, how wrong the all too common orientation of police officers is when they think of their job as being to write tickets and arrest people. Richard Mack tells of his personal transformation from by the number cop

[00:28:18] to constitution conscious defender of citizen safety and freedoms. Learn what it really means to serve and protect. Purchase your copy at CSPOA dot org at CSPOA dot org. Do you know what is great about America? Ask an immigrant.

[00:28:32] Ask an immigrant is a new podcast dedicated to helping Americans, especially our youth value, appreciate and be grateful for the freedoms we have here in America. Join host Lydia Wallace Nuttall as she interviews immigrants from around the world to discover their inspiring personal stories

[00:28:48] about why they came to America to learn more about why America is the most prosperous, greatest country in the world. Download the loving Liberty app or go to loving liberty dot net. As you all know, Roe versus Wade has resulted in some of the most

[00:29:06] permissive abortion laws anywhere in the world. For example, in the United States, it's one of only seven countries to allow elective late term abortions along with China, North Korea and others. Right now, in a number of states, the laws allow a baby

[00:29:24] to be born from his or her mother's womb in the ninth month. It is wrong. It has to change. Americans are more and more pro-life. You see that all the time. In fact, only 12% of Americans support abortion on demand at any time.

[00:29:47] Under my administration, we will always defend the very first right in the Declaration of Independence, and that is the right to life. All right. Back to you live, Dr. Scott Bradley, Sam Bushman on your radio for our buddy Tom Fitton over at judicial watch has a report.

[00:30:25] Ladies and gentlemen, he calls it huge. New documents reveal. Now I want to point you to the gateway pundit dot com. Christina Layla with this article, and then I want to also point you to judicial watch dot org because that's where the story originates.

[00:30:42] Let's listen to Tom and then we'll talk about it. Here it is. Hey, everyone, Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton here. We got some crazy documents from the Secret Service about Joe Biden's crazy dog commander attacking Secret Service personnel.

[00:30:55] According to the documents, which we got thanks to a federal FOIA lawsuit, Joe had the dog when he attacked Secret Service. One of the incidents show that Joe was walking the dog, had the dog when the dog attacked the Secret Service agent twice, bit him on the arm.

[00:31:10] Not once, but twice while Joe had the dog. Other documents show the Secret Service was trying to delete records. It shows without a shadow of a doubt that Joe Biden is personally responsible for the attacks of his dogs and Secret Service personnel.

[00:31:27] Of course, Joe had the dog from other documents we know when the dog attacked Secret Service as well. So both are responsible for it looks like upwards of two, three dozen attacks on Secret Service and White House personnel.

[00:31:41] What type of insanity is going on over there in the White House that the first couple would allow their dogs to attack Secret Service personnel repeatedly? And of course, all of this was exposed only thanks to the heavy lifting of Judicial Watch.

[00:32:00] What the heck, Dr. Bradley, this is insanity. Well, you know, there's a lot of articles out there. In the time you brought this up, I've been doing a a little look on the on the Gateway Pundit, and there's multiple articles

[00:32:13] on that, but there's multiple articles over the years, literally when when Joe has had these vicious dogs and so from other sources also. But this one here dated yesterday, the 13th, about Joe being personally responsible for attack dog attacks

[00:32:34] on his Secret Service agents back in September of twenty one. There's some video of Joe kicking his German shepherd. There's a February of twenty four, the bit in Secret Service, at least three different states at twenty four times. I mean, I'm just reading the headlines out loud.

[00:32:55] I mean, the articles obviously have much more behind them. But October of twenty three punches and kicks his dog. It sounds like he's a he's a bad owner. I mean, you know, there's there's bad drunks. I mean, there's mean drunks. There's people that,

[00:33:13] you know, normal happy go lucky personality, and they get a few beers in them and they suddenly became become belligerent. And there's there's maybe the same thing could be said about people that are suffering from cognitive decline, like through dementia and so forth.

[00:33:30] I mean, I've known people that were just the most pleasant, mellow people in the world until they got severe dementia and they became violent. And so it's it's like maybe that's another indication of Joe's cognitive kind of, shall we say, decline.

[00:33:51] But I've got lots of articles I've come up with here. Holy cow. It goes back long periods of time. This stuff, this is an ongoing challenge. And it seems to me like they ought to figure this out.

[00:34:05] I mean, well, I don't know how they allow this to continue. If anybody else had a dog that had bit one or two or three or four people, there'd be lawsuits, there'd be animal control, there'd be cities and counties and states, you know, stopping this.

[00:34:17] And hey, you just can't let this continue. Thirty two times, one dog, twenty three times. That's the current dog commander, major ten times. Many of these requiring literal medical attention. Now, just to watch said they received one hundred and sixteen pages

[00:34:33] of, quote, United States Secret Service records from DHS. That's the Department of Homeland Security through FOIA. That's the Freedom of Intervention Act. That provides the details showing the bitings that took place in everything else. OK, these documents were obtained after Disho Watch

[00:34:53] reported that Joe Biden abuses his dogs. Now, here's the point. Can you really have a president that abuses animals and is publicly documented as doing so? Thirty two times bit secret service agents and stuff like that. Two different dogs at some point.

[00:35:11] I mean, he's got a dog on a leash and it still attacks and bites secret service agents and stuff like this. At some point, you go, this is just absolutely off the chain. And you can say, well, this doesn't really matter.

[00:35:24] Well, what about all the cover up of the secret service documents? What about the fact that they wouldn't obey the FOIA request? So Tom Fitton and judicial watch had to sue to get the records. What about all this record manipulation for?

[00:35:36] I mean, if they're going to manipulate records over Joe and his dog because they don't want it coming out, what real issues are they manipulating and perverting and destroying and whatever records related to? You know, where does this lead us as a country?

[00:35:47] If we look at this thing, you could say it's a simple thing and kind of funny. On the other hand, I think it's very, very serious, doctor. Well, it is. And I think that this is just I mean, the whole administration is whacked out.

[00:36:00] I mean, I've got here in front of me a book that I had the original manuscript copy, if you will, before it was published. It's called Unlimited Access. People ought to read about it. It's about the the Clinton administration and the FBI agent

[00:36:12] that was there as a liaison during that period of time. And there are administrations that the wheels have fallen off. But right now I'm going back. Noah Webster was an American founding father. OK, and he wrote advice to the young in the history of the United States.

[00:36:28] And this this was published. It was a short history because it had been around that long. But at any rate, Webster wrote this for training the young. One one idea popped in my mind. Things that that are the antithesis

[00:36:44] of what Joe Biden is right now, you think with this terror read experience in the 1990s, assaulting the staffer in the hallways of the Senate office, you know, just to read you a couple of little little things, questions and answers. Here's what Webster wrote to young men.

[00:37:03] I would recommend that their treatment of females should always be characterized by kindness, delicacy and respect. The chief temporal advantages of Christianity, the elevation of the female character, let justice be done to their merits, guard their purity, defend their honor, treat them with tenderness and respect.

[00:37:22] Can now this is this is what they were teaching in the the school system in America in the early days. Now, the next one is a question. Should not beasts as well as men be treated with mercy? Answer they ought indeed.

[00:37:36] It is wrong to give needless pain even to a beast. If a man treats his beast with cruelty, beware of trusting yourself in his power. He will probably make a severe master and a cruel husband.

[00:37:50] I mean, this is the stuff that we taught in our in our commander in chief as seemingly needs to be further researched in those areas. And if he's if he's abusing his dog, his dog has become again. They say there's no bad dogs. There's only bad masters.

[00:38:09] But if if this kind of stuff is going on, it's the antithesis of what Americans, you know, basically had his core values back in the founding area era. And so if if Biden go back and read the accounts of terror read and what happened that basically.

[00:38:30] Yeah, that was the critical chronicle Chronicles days, right? Yeah, well, it was. But but but but Biden is the guy that was doing it. I mean, Clinton, yeah, he had his own dalliances, if you will. And some of them were with women that were fully complicit

[00:38:47] and others of them were assaulted by him. And he paid off what? Eight hundred and fifty thousand dollars to do a silencing thing. Joe Joe Biden. I don't know what he did to get rid of terror read. Trump got paid one hundred and thirty thousand dollars

[00:39:04] on a non disclosure with Stormy Daniels, apparently. I mean, these kind of things, it's like, holy cow. I know we're we're kind of blending some things here with the way people and their personalities are. The rule of law just doesn't apply to these people

[00:39:18] like it does the rest of us, whether, you know, Joe commutes the sentence of Hunter or full out pardons him no matter what. Look, Donald Trump being unfairly tried, even Hunter being unfairly tried really on the charges that I see right now.

[00:39:35] And then, hey, you got judicial watch. They have to sue to get these pages. Well, now people are saying, look, not only is Joe Biden evil and abusive, because look what his dogs do under his control, but they covered up and tried to, you know, manipulate records.

[00:39:52] That alone should get you impeached when you modify or manipulate records. I mean, that's that's serious. Well, now a congressman wants to know when is Joe Biden on the juice? So everybody knows and speculates that Joe Biden is given a concoction of drugs

[00:40:08] just to be lucid enough to to interact and everything. And when he's not on his drugs, you see a drastic difference. And so they want to know when is Joe Biden on the juice? Question mark. Congress wants to be notified. Lawmaker quote White House occupied by someone

[00:40:26] who is literally incapable of speaking. Bob unwrote WND.com with the story. Representative guy's name is Andy Ogles, I guess, is a say his name is from Tennessee. He's putting a bill in place. He's proposing legislation that would require notification when Joe Biden gets juiced up

[00:40:48] or given stimulants that could alter his moods and his behavior. Joe Biden's swings in moods and in performance already has attracted headlines multiple times. And sometimes he speaks at a whisper, sometimes he shouts through the entire speech. And Arnold's or Arnold's. How do you say this name?

[00:41:11] OGLES, Ogles. Ogles calls his bill the quote no juicing Joe act. It says it was prompted by the refusal of the White House to test Biden's cognition because they know that he will fail miserably. So we literally now have a

[00:41:31] I don't know what you want to say, a proposed bill in Congress that says we need to know when Joe's juiced. And that's the question. Does that relate his moods and his behavior and shouting and whispering and all this kind of stuff?

[00:41:44] How does that relate to his dogs? Manipulating records, denying illegally FOIA requests and more. I mean, this is just bigger than we think, doctor. Well, I think this this bill ought to be tied to the 25th Amendment.

[00:42:02] The 25th Amendment talks about whether or not the president is unable to discharge his powers and duties. And what we have clearly is within the even handle his dog. Well, don't you think any normal person of your dog bit?

[00:42:15] Secret service agents, you know, even five times should be like, listen, we've got to do something with this dog. This dog's out of control. You know. But 32 times, and then when we try to get the information on it through judicial watch, they literally modify and manipulate records

[00:42:30] so we don't get them. We have to sue to finally get them. I mean, what is happening here? Well, there is a cover up going on within the administration. There's no question about it, because the 25th Amendment requires the vice president, majority of the principal officers

[00:42:47] to make this declaration that's transmitted to the Senate and the House. And then saying the president's unable to discharge the powers and duties of the office. OK? And then there's an argument back and forth. The 25th Amendment is going to it's going to bite us on the behind

[00:43:03] one of these days. But right now, if I were if I were, you know, the guy bringing this forth, I would tie it to the 25th Amendment and say, you know, that some of these cognitive disabilities that they they mask with with different drugs

[00:43:19] are actually putting the nation at risk. And this is, I know, a corollary tangent, but it is kind of a corollary. I think that in all the instances that we have been given the information and they're doing a pretty good job of trying to

[00:43:33] hide that information at this time, there's been these somatic type drugs that have been involved in these mass shootings. It's where they use these SSRI type drugs, these selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor drugs like a Prozac or something like that, the Prozac type drugs

[00:43:52] where where it causes a cognitive disconnect. There's suicidal or homicidal effects that come in. Well, if the president is receiving them, I don't know the concoction they're giving to the president by any means. And I would not be my prerogative to basically diagnose that.

[00:44:10] But I think that there are people that are capable of saying, OK, with this drug, we're going to have to do something about it. With this drug, you have these side effects. And if they're making him cognitively able to speak or

[00:44:24] or stand in front of a group without melting down, it might be destroying his judgment criteria. I mean, here's maybe we'll read to it. And this shouldn't we the people know of the president has to take drugs to be lucid enough to serve.

[00:44:39] The people in other words, going back to this 25th Amendment discussion, I mean, look, if he can't do that without this quote medication and whoever's managing the medications, they try to do that for Michael Jackson.

[00:44:50] You know, Michael Jackson, when he would go to bed, they give him downers. And when you wake up, they give him uppers and they mismanage that. And they killed him is really what happened with all that. OK, well, the same thing's true here.

[00:44:59] Can you really have a president in the United States? This the commander in chief sworn to uphold the Constitution, protect it from enemies, foreign and domestic while he's literally can't perform without being on these manmade concoctions? Well, what gives with all this?

[00:45:14] Maybe in the second hour, we'll get on to a broader discussion about this. But let me just broach it right now and you can decide whether or not we want to pursue this. But the fact of the matter is we have right now

[00:45:26] a Cuban missile crisis that's on our hands in the lane. We're going to talk about that coming up. Here's the deal. Jack Kennedy was faced with a joint chiefs of staff in 1962. October, everybody, 100 percent of the people in the room said, we got to go against Cuba.

[00:45:47] We got to attack. We got to invade. We got to, you know, basically conquer. And John F. Kennedy, diplomat, said, Nope, we're going to take a different path. He was standing alone. He listened to the people and then he said, here's the decision.

[00:46:01] I don't think Joe Biden could do that. He was right. I mean, I remember those days very well, but we can talk about some of the things that happened. But but the fact of the matter is that we don't have

[00:46:13] John F. Kennedy in the in the office right now. And we what we have is someone that would have trouble remembering where his house slippers are, probably. And if we have to juice him up to get him to be able to stand

[00:46:26] in front of an audience or sit at a desk like they want to do in the debate upcoming on the 27th of June, if they have to do that kind of thing and he's cognitively impaired to the point that if it is a very real world,

[00:46:41] Cuba missile crisis right now with nuclear weapons and the Cuban waters on Soviet ships. And it's been it's been basically precipitated by our announcement that we're going to say, oh, it's OK if Ukraine uses U.S. supplied weapons anywhere against Russia. That's what precipitated the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis.

[00:47:07] When we put weapons in Turkey and Italy. But again, back to the same stupidity, we're going to talk about this more. But here's two headlines that relate to this. First one says Russian warships headed to Cuba. There's a Caribbean. Yeah, I'm in heightened detentions.

[00:47:32] All right. USA Today now reporting this Tom Vandenbroek reporting it. OK, USA Today is even meeting at eight. So now we've got these warships, including submarines in our hemisphere headed to Cuba. The next headline says this G seven leaders

[00:47:48] reach deal to unlock frozen Russian assets for the Ukraine. So now we're going to have the global G seven people literally steal assets from Ukraine. They they they lock the assets down. Now they're going to steal them. I'm sorry, Russian assets and give them to the Ukraine.

[00:48:05] We are absolutely promoting war, doctor. These are acts. These are acts of war. This this stuff. I mean, even Kennedy was sensitive to the fact in 1962 that a the blockade would be an act of war. But Joe Love's violence.

[00:48:23] Look at his dogs all the way up to running the nation in his war mentality there. He's consistently hostile and violent and vacant at home. That that's the problem is we get mean drunks and we get mean, dementia patients.

[00:48:37] But but the fact of the matter is he is not capable of keeping us out of World War three. And it will only be a basically a kindness of tender mercy of God that keeps us out of this. What he has unleashed literally are acts of war.

[00:48:54] And for G seven to say, oh, yeah, the United States and everybody can now confiscate Russian funds. These are acts of war. The the the embargoes were placing up there, these blockages, everything and G7 is expanding the and the way that they're they're trying to do these economic

[00:49:18] sanctions against anybody that deals with with Russia. All of these things are excellent. That's why we went to war in 1812. This is the exact reason the United States went to war in 1812. The Brits thought they were mistress of the world.

[00:49:34] They could board any American ship, they could redirect. They could say, where are you headed? What port you're going to know? You can't go there, blah, blah, blah, blah. And finally, Madison said, the heck you say, we're not going to put up with this anymore.

[00:49:47] And the the war of 1812 really was our second independence, where it was the war to make the first one stick. We really are an independent nation. But what we're doing to Russia right now and and Putin has responded and he's had some not so veiled threats

[00:50:06] that if these kind of things are carried out and they will be carried out, if you deliver an American made weapon inland into Russia, see right up until this very recently. It wasn't this date right there today.

[00:50:19] But the the the weapons of destruction that we have sent to Ukraine were to be used in a in a mode in their own war within their own lands. And then defensive kind of things. We've basically said you can use them offensively.

[00:50:34] But if they're delivering something remotely, distantly into Russia, it's going to take US support. We're going to provide them intel. We're going to provide them with satellite imagery. We're going to provide them, maybe even refuel any aircraft or whatever that's in the air.

[00:50:49] I don't know whatever approach they take. It is a surrogate war of the United States against Russia and Russia. I think that's why they entered Ukraine to begin with. In February of 22, we had put our armed forces, NATO forces up against their border everywhere, basically except Ukraine.

[00:51:11] And Russia is saying, no, this is the line in the sand or the line in the concrete, whatever it is. We are not going to allow this to happen. They entered Ukraine. If you listen to Putin's interview with Carlson, you heard a long history lesson about this.

[00:51:26] But what we have done, this idiocy that we have gone through to say, take our weapons and deliver them to the motherland, if you will. Russia, there's going to be blowback. And they have sent nuclear powered vessels into Cuba, which could be used. They have launch capability.

[00:51:48] I don't know exactly which missiles are carrying. OK, I don't know that. But the fact that but our prayer is that we don't we can avoid war here. But I'm telling you right now, we are hurtling towards war. And every action we're taking escalates that reality. It does.

[00:52:04] And whether you're confiscating their financial means or whether you're putting sanctions against anybody that deals with them, I think we're we're just damned fools is what it is. I mean, you look at the European countries, the European Union,

[00:52:18] by the way, the Russians have quit trading in dollars and euros. OK, so what has that done? Well, it's further undermined the dollar as the, you know, the global currency, if you will. You know, the OPEC dollar and all that kind of stuff.

[00:52:33] No rush to say we won't we won't trade in that. Their exchange now won't do that. So we're pushing them further away from, you know, reasonable ends further into China's. We're saying, oh, we're going to sanction China. Oh, that's another good idea. OK, so everywhere you turn,

[00:52:52] we are taking stupid steps and we have buffoons running this country right now. Well, you're right about that. And we're melting down in a big way. Next hour, I'm going to kick off. You mentioned this, you know, dollar hegemony. It's over, baby.

[00:53:10] You mentioned that other people are going to start trading in other currencies. There is a new update on this that is serious, serious. Indeed, the decoupling of the dollar as the world's currency is happening faster than you can imagine. Ladies and gentlemen, we're aware of that.

[00:53:28] We're not only encouraging it, we're forcing it to happen by our war. Yes. Crazy hegemonic mentality. It's out of control. Anyway, we'll talk about that in more detail next hour. Because, you know, Joe Biden's foreign and economic policies have slowly eroded the United States dollar.

[00:53:48] Now it's going to happen at lightning speed. There's something that just happened that'll tell you about next hour that really makes this game change happen faster than you can imagine. So be aware of that. By the way, if you guys want to check out Dr. Bradley's weekly webinars,

[00:54:04] his collegiate series and more to preserve the nation, his Q&A is on the Constitution. Go to freedoms rising sun dot com. You want to check out our new websites, go to Liberty News Radio dot com and loving Liberty dot net. You can check it out.

[00:54:19] We've updated both sites, great news feeds and podcasts, you know, archives of the shows, easy to listen live, donate a whole lot more. Check them all out. Freedom Sizing Sun dot com, Liberty News Radio dot com and loving Liberty dot net for Dr.

[00:54:35] Scott Bradley, our one in the can, our two coming up. And for yours truly, God save the Republic of the United States of America.