Radio Show Hour 2 – 06/14/2024

[00:00:13] . Broadcasting live from atop the Rocky Mountains, the crossroads of the West. You are listening to the Liberty Roundtable Radio Talk Show. All right, ladies and gentlemen, we're in serious trouble in the United States of America. That is for sure.

[00:00:30] This is the broadcast for June 14th in the year of our Lord 2024. Hard hitting news, the network refused to use, no doubt continues now. We want to promote God, family and country and protect life, liberty and property.

[00:00:41] That is what we do in the traditions of our founding fathers. We follow the Prince of Peace. The battle's on. Congress wants to know if Joe's juicing, so they want a bill to find out whenever they put him on a concoction of drugs.

[00:00:54] We're talking about warships headed to Cuba, Russian warships, I might add. G7 leaders reach deal to unlock frozen Russian assets and give them to the Ukraine. Every move we're making is absolutely war criminal activity as we hurdle towards war. That's what they want.

[00:01:12] Well, it's getting worse now too because you think inflation is out of control now? You just wait, baby, because since the 1970s, ladies and gentlemen, Saudi Arabia has sold its crude oil in U.S. currency under what's called the Petrodollar Agreement, which

[00:01:31] is a massive contributor to the U.S. dollar's international standing. I don't know if you know, but that 50-year-old year agreement Saudi Arabia had with the United States is over. Saudi Arabia's 50-year-old Petrodollar Agreement with the United States has expired

[00:01:48] with no new agreement in place, ladies and gentlemen. This is going to let Saudi Arabia sell, I guess, in different currencies like the Chinese, Euros, Yen, and the Yuan and all these different currencies instead of exclusively in U.S. dollars.

[00:02:08] This is going to tank the strength of the dollar on the world market, ladies and gentlemen. You watch BRICS push hard. You watch Russia flex its muscle. You watch other nations go along as everybody begs to join BRICS against the U.S. dollar.

[00:02:27] U.S. hegemony is going away rapidly. This escalates that discussion like you wouldn't believe, Doctor. Well, there's no question that everything that's happening, I understand, in bold letters, all caps, undermined, italicized, every, the word is every way, the current

[00:02:48] policies of the United States are, they're basically formulated to not only destroy the independence and sovereignty of the nation but merge us into a global government. Now we could go back to the Brentwoods issues in the 1940s and come forward to

[00:03:06] Nixon and his petrodollar and what was negotiated there and everything with the decoupling of the dollar from real money, which was actually defined in the 1792 Coinage Act in the United States, with the decoupling from real money that was to allow them to print

[00:03:24] and create money at will through the Fed. And basically with that creation of money, it creates inflation. But it had to be tied to some kind of solid asset. And that asset was oil. Everybody used gold and silver. It worked great for a couple hundred years, sir.

[00:03:44] Well, that's true. But the fact of the matter is they said we're not going to do that anymore. And so they said, OK, let's tie it to oil. Everybody wants oil. The OPEC nation said we'll only deal in dollars with oil.

[00:03:56] So that gave me kind of a stabilizing effect. The dollar. We went willy nilly with dollar creation. The Fed has won't even tell us how much they've created even in the last year. I mean, the debt that we're creating that's admitted.

[00:04:10] I mean, we're talking trillions of dollars in some years that are as created with the United States, but they created internationally, too. There was always somebody to soak up those dollars because they could use them to buy oil. Well, now they've decoupled that.

[00:04:24] OK, because the agreements gone away. The dollar itself will seek its own level. People will say, hey, wait a minute. I don't need dollars anymore. I can buy I can buy this with Chinese money or I can buy it with with Russian gold

[00:04:38] or I can buy it with the rubles, I can buy whatever I can buy. And this idea that the United States would try to force these 50 year agreements on people, what would they do that for?

[00:04:47] And the only answer to that is, hey, the fiat currency is a Ponzi scheme. And the only way to make it not fail is to make it grow. Put more and more people into the slaughter machine as it expands, expands, expands. That's what that was about.

[00:04:58] It would have never lasted the last 50 plus years. If they had to have a count for the currency. And at the end, there's going to be a halt to this con game because where will you expand the dollar to without that expansion? Fiat currency fails, doctor.

[00:05:11] This is a proven historical fact. The dollar will seek its own level. The founding fathers understood this. I mean, they talked about paper money dying in the people's hands because it didn't have any real tangible value. And it was suddenly and super officially and intent, you know,

[00:05:30] intentionally and ultimately. I mean, all of those kind of things, you'll find that the dollar loses its value. And that's what's going to happen. OK, so so right now, the United States is cutting its own throat with the way it does business with every other nation.

[00:05:45] It's it's seizing other nations assets. It's saying who can do business with other people? Other nations are getting dang sick and tired of it. And and you talk about bricks. I mean, the people are flocking to bricks where the it's like, you know,

[00:06:03] some an opposing viewpoint, if you will, from the G7 and so on or the G20. You know, the Russians and the Brazil and India and China and South Africa. That's what the brick stands for. But but there's other nations that are flocking to it.

[00:06:19] It is becoming an economic house of other nations. It is. And so here we are the hegemony of the dollar. And it should be. I mean, I hate to say that because it has been a force fed kind of thing for all these years.

[00:06:35] The dollar should stand on its own merit and should say we are strong and stable and we are, you know, we're an asset you can flee to. Yeah, but that can only happen if we're backed by constitutional currency, though the founders understood this reality check.

[00:06:50] We've jettisoned ourselves from it. We're paying the piper now. Well, we had a 50 year. Oh, we see all the guys that made that agreement 50 years ago were basically off the scene. Politically, they're gone. But the people today don't even understand.

[00:07:05] They can't find their butt with both hands at the same time, let alone do all of these things like address the the war footing that we're going into, by the way, we've picked a way to fight Russia with our weapons. Giving gloves off kind of thing.

[00:07:24] And Russia's responding by placing things to see what happened in the Kennedy days. We we put. OK, let's as Kennedy came into office, Eisenhower had set up a huge I mean, with John Foster Dulles, his secretary of state, had set up a huge snare.

[00:07:46] They had planned a Bay of Pigs invasion. OK, we trained the CIA, trained insurgents to land them on the beach and take over Cuba. OK, we armed them. It was a stupid, stupid plan for a lot of absolutely.

[00:08:04] Why would we ever do that if we follow the strategic piece and if we're a peace loving people in the traditions of George Washington? Why would we ever do that? But that's a side note. So it was morally wrong. Right. Absolutely. But our weapon selection, the landing location,

[00:08:18] the escape routes, the support system, you know, everything at logistically everything. I mean, it was a absolute disaster. If Eisenhower had led the World War Two effort. Wait a minute. Didn't he? No. Eisenhower would never if Eisenhower was showing his military prowess

[00:08:37] in the planning and execution of this Bay of Pigs thing, which was planned and was then carried out to the the Kennedy administration. Eisenhower would have lost World War Two hands down. But anyway, that's another discussion. So anyway, we did the Bay of Pigs invasion.

[00:08:54] We had terrorist acts we were doing in Cuba. We had plans potentially to assassinate their leadership and so on and so forth. Cuba was looking potentially to China to be have a partnership or a closer relationship. The United States in the interim had placed nuclear weapons in

[00:09:13] in Turkey and in Italy. The ones again in Turkey were the most problematic for the Russians because this is where the blowback happens. We put our stakes in their area. They're going to put their stakes in our area. And then we basically pretend to fight against it,

[00:09:27] but let it really end up being a beachhead established right here in our hemisphere. Right. I mean, we fostered that into resistance. Doctor, we did. We created our own monster. And so what happened was Cuba, Castro and Khrushchev, Russia,

[00:09:42] got together in July of 62 and says, you know what? If they're going to put these on our doorstep, let's put some on America's doorstep. It was a tit for tat thing. But there was all sorts of logistics prior to that.

[00:09:53] There was there was surface to air missiles that were installed. There was air bases. There were bombers that were placed there, strategic bombers. And then they bring in the nuclear devices, these intercontinental ballistic missiles, by the way, they were capable of reaching basically everything but Oregon and Washington

[00:10:12] in the very northern tip of California. They reached into Canada. They could have reached literally basically almost every square foot, except those I excluded under the the watchful eye of nuclear weapons. OK, now I know a little bit more about this because I had a friend

[00:10:30] that was in the crypto room on Cuba, get more at Guantanamo Bay and for weeks his crypto room was communicating with the White House crypto room. Kennedy didn't just find out about this in the middle of October. My friend had been communicating encrypted messages, photos,

[00:10:52] all sorts of intelligence. The White House knew this was coming. And so suddenly, and I remember so well when Kennedy came on our black and white TV and said, oh, we're going to have a real big we're walking in nuclear war.

[00:11:06] He called his joint chiefs of staff together. He consulted with them. He asked them, what do you think we ought to do? One hundred percent of them were for invasion and attack on Cuba. And they're saying, no, they're not going to they're not going to respond.

[00:11:22] Kennedy said they may not respond here, but this will be a green light for Berlin. If we're going to attack and remember the Berlin wall and all that kind of stuff, that'll greenlight them to take over at least Berlin and maybe more of Germany.

[00:11:38] Anyway, there was diplomatic things going on and the military personnel said, let's bomb them to the dark ages. Kennedy said, no, we're going to do something else. So ultimately, and finally, Khrushchev and Kennedy talked it out and privately they said, OK, you take ours out,

[00:11:56] we'll take ours out tit for tat. We at least took him out of Turkey. I think there was a removal also from Italy, but I'm not positive. He took his out of Cuba. The strategic bombers left there like the 20th of November. So we avoided that.

[00:12:18] It was the closest, they say, in that two week period that we came to nuclear holocaust during the Cold War. But what has happened is we have set up a nuclear holocaust scenario. And Russia, these history lessons are not lost on the Russians.

[00:12:37] They remember history and you remember the history lesson Putin gave Tucker Carlson. They remember history. They remember the invasion of the Nazis when they had an agreement with the Nazis that they had put together in August of 39. The Nazis turned on them. The Russians have long memories.

[00:13:00] We don't. We don't even believe in history in this nation. But these things should be discussed by every American, and we should say, no, we're not going to we're not going to go into a warfare which will further undermine, destroy, bring about the goal. But we are.

[00:13:15] We literally take Russian frozen assets and grant them to Ukraine. We literally green light actions around the world like bricks getting more people like the dollar losing support. Now Saudi Arabia's 50 year old pet peeve Now Saudi Arabia's 50 year old petrodollar agreement. They're not going to renew that sucker.

[00:13:33] So I'm just telling you right now, you do that. Plus, you start putting these things in place where you're like, hey, Russian warships are headed to Cuba. And G7 leaders are going to do this. Everything they're doing is ratcheting this up to.

[00:13:49] I'm just telling you right now, watch this carefully because you think inflation is out of control. Now, here's the question. If Donald Trump continues to have such a commanding lead, over Commander and Joe, will they push us to war?

[00:14:06] Will they decouple the dollar faster, demand the new currency? The House just voted against a digital currency. But they might force us into this even before the election doctor. Now, I'm not saying that's a fact. I'm just saying this is a real possibility.

[00:14:18] What lengths will they go to if Joe's not pardoned upon top dog with a big bite? Then what? And what level will they go to on this altar is the question. Well, the thing is that it's happening at every level,

[00:14:31] whether it's a health care thing with the covid con or whether it's an economic thing with the decoupling of the dollar and the and all of the things that we're doing to basically say we're going to make the dollar worthless because it will seek its own level.

[00:14:45] Or whether it's militarily, it's our commitment to to squander military weaponry all across the nation as we show. I mean, across the world, as we ship it to Israel and as we ship it to Ukraine, we're eight years behind the manufacturing curve

[00:15:00] right now in one hundred fifty five millimeter artillery. We have at every level. OK, with the race level, with the religion level, with the moral issues, with the with the way we're basically fostering abortion. All of these things are fracture lines that are putting us at high risk.

[00:15:20] And so you can't just say, oh, it's if we backed off on the economic thing or if we backed off on the Ukraine thing. But but OK, I'm talking fast because I know we don't have much time, but Ukraine. Skipped their election.

[00:15:34] In May. OK, so here's what happens. Ukraine's president is elected for a five year term. Zelensky was elected in 2019. He's his term was set to expire and be replaced in May of 2024. But when Zelensky was president and they got invaded in 2022, Zelensky declared martial law.

[00:15:59] The president, OK, the guy that's going to be up for election. Their constitution basically says we can't have an election when there's martial law. Oh, who did it? Oh, it's the guy that's already in office. OK, so now there's a lot of agreement.

[00:16:12] I mean, there's probably a lot of sense it makes. If you want to discuss it and say, well, they've got a disrupted society. They've got people displaced. They got a lot of unless it was intentionally done as a false flag to ensure there wouldn't be an election.

[00:16:25] But yeah, absolutely. So and so right now, they've kept extending extending the the martial law thing. They keep extending it 90 days, 90 days and so on. Now their their agreement is that the they will not hold elections until at least at least six months after martial law is retracted.

[00:16:48] So does that mean 2025, 2026? I mean, Zelensky may be there for life. Who knows unless there's other precipitous action which could be taken because this is how banana republics and military junta has come to power is somebody gets impatient and they do a political assassination or something. That's possible.

[00:17:07] But but at any rate, there will be a change of power at some point. But right now they have skipped their election. And I know lots of people that think we're not going to make it to the 2024 election in November in the United States. Now, you know what?

[00:17:23] We didn't cancel elections during the Civil War when there was bloodshed all across the land. Tens of thousands of Americans are being killed. We didn't do it then. We didn't do it during World War Two. There's no justification for it.

[00:17:35] There is no martial law clause in the United States Constitution. In other words, there's no authority to make that happen, is your point. Correct. But there are people that are saying, well, maybe it could get bad enough. But there's no authority to do what some people are suggesting

[00:17:52] could or would or should be done. But but these are the kind of times we're in right now, Sam. And we are here unless we get smart. And some of the leadership starts to be a little bit more. Oh, shall we say, diplomatic and statesmanlike?

[00:18:09] We're we're pretty deep doo doo right now. And Joe Biden is the 25th Amendment waiting to happen. But I have a little bit of good news on the horizon. Oh, I hope his name is Judge Reed O'Connor, ladies and gentlemen, and Judge Reed O'Connor, federal judge,

[00:18:25] Reed O'Connor O'Connor overturns ATF pistol brace rule. Now, listen, he granted their plaintiff's motion for a summary judgment. And order the rule to be vacated. Now, let's be clear. So people understand this was a Trump era gun bump stock ban, no authority whatsoever. Donald did this.

[00:18:52] Everybody thinks Donald's the good guy and Joe's the bad guy. Donald did this. Not only did Donald allow you to get locked down more so than in any other time in history that I know of this bump stock thing to go into place.

[00:19:06] And now it got overturned by this judge O'Connor. And I say it's a little bit of good news, doctor. Well, it's it's or it's only overturned in some specific areas of his jurisdiction. It will be appealed ultimately to the Supreme Court and it should

[00:19:23] ultimately be deflected as a as an overstep, by the way, of the BATF. They are not the legislature. They cannot create law. And again, they're an unconstitutional organization to begin with, and we could talk about that at length. But the fact of the matter is you're right.

[00:19:38] Joe Biden did not put the bump stock ban into place. Donald Trump did the guy that wanted the red flag laws where they can come on your front door, kick your door in and say over for your own safety. We're taking your guns.

[00:19:52] So so Donald Trump has had some real problematic issues with the Second Amendment. He said, oh, we'll take care of due process later. No, that is now we've got to get this done. But the but the the the brace, the pistol brace issue is still up for grabs,

[00:20:06] which came in during the Joe Biden era. And so so we have got I mean, at every level, at every turn, there's an assault on our our liberty or natural law or natural rights or God given rights that if you read the Declaration of Independence,

[00:20:26] governments are created to secure those rights. Governments are created to secure those rights. Our government is under full assault on this and they're facilitating it with assault from the G7 where they're saying, oh, it's OK, go ahead and steal all the Russian assets, give them to Ukraine.

[00:20:43] Now they need the money anyway. Yeah, the Russians are the aggressors. We we precipitated the aggression in a similar manner to what we did with the Japanese World War Two. FDR wanted a war that he could be on the same side of Stalin.

[00:20:58] And this all these precipitation actions came to be. People just need to they need to do some in depth dives on where we have been at these these ploys work every time and we keep stepping in the same traps.

[00:21:13] It's absolutely it does repeat itself in a negative way. But all I can tell you is at least we've reversed some of the the ban by Donald. That's well in some areas and for a period of time until it's

[00:21:25] reviewed further, this is not a nationwide that we didn't set this aside on a nationwide basis right now. No judge has as a jurisdiction and it's only going to be in and it's limited states, but it's something and at least

[00:21:38] it's a pushback and at least it's up for challenge and at least it's trying to be unwound and the judge deserves a little bit of credit for this. Absolutely. Reed O'Connor deserves some credit. So I get that it's not holistic.

[00:21:49] I get that it's not over, but this is where the American people hear that we've overturned that. Now there needs to be a flood against Donald and Joe saying, hey, these bump stocks are bogus with the ban on them.

[00:22:01] I mean, we need to get rid of that ban. We need to not have our right to keep and bear arms infringed. This is where the American people, if they were to really unite in great numbers, we could change the game and ensure that it was nationally overturned.

[00:22:13] But it's only if we're willing to stand up, doctor. And this is the you know, someone opened the window. Are we going to jump through it? The you know, I think it's really nice. This is happening. I hope it goes further. I hope it becomes nationwide and permanent.

[00:22:28] I personally, I don't care to have a bump stock. The only reason I would have one is so I could take my grandkids out and spend a lot of money on ammunition. They're a very ineffective tool. But if people want them, they should have them.

[00:22:43] I mean, I personally find them of no value because, I mean, your sight picture and you kind of let the firearm have its way with you. And that's the only way you can make them operate properly. But it's fun for little kids to shoot full auto.

[00:22:57] Some people are adults find it a thing. But the real issue is to get rid of the bump stock ban. And the real issue is to get rid of the ban on fully auto weapons as well. I think people should be able to have fully auto weapons, doctor.

[00:23:08] There's no question about that. The 1934 Firearms Act, by the way, was passed as a revenue act. And that was how they got it through. And the Miller case that went to the Supreme Court, we could talk about that at great length about that reinforced

[00:23:26] the fact that Americans could have military grade weapons. The only reason it was ruled against the Miller, they had a sawed off shotgun, a short barreled shotgun. The guys, the defendants never even showed up in the Supreme Court. In fact, one had died.

[00:23:42] Maybe the other one had to. I can't remember. Anyway, the two defendants on that never showed up. Their defense attorney didn't show up. And the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the government position, saying that nobody came up and told us that these short

[00:23:57] barreled shotguns had ever been used in a war setting. And so therefore they can control them. Well, since shotguns were invented, short barreled shotguns have been used in combat situations. I mean, and some of the guys, one of the least of the Supreme

[00:24:12] Court justices had served in World War One. And these trench sweeper, short barreled shotguns had been used very effectively against the Germans in World War One. I mean, but they are right. Keep your bare arms shall not be infringed.

[00:24:27] That's what the American people need to insist we take action on. All right. After the break, I want to switch gears. Donald floating an interesting idea. Trump floats. They call it one weird idea to replace the U.S. income tax.

[00:24:41] They claim it's hard to see how it work and critics say that it would hurt the poor. Well, I'm in complete favor of it. Let's talk about it. Protecting your liberties. You're listening to Liberty News Radio USA News. I'm Ryan Daniels.

[00:25:05] The United States is investing 60 billion dollars in global infrastructure. The announcement coincides with President Biden's appearance alongside G7 leaders in Italy. Additionally, the U.S. and its allies have agreed on a plan to provide Ukraine with a 50 billion dollar loan for defense and reconstruction

[00:25:23] amid its ongoing war with Russia. There is now a U.S. submarine deployed near Cuba after two Russian warships docked in Havana this week, according to the U.S. Southern Command headquarters. This deployment had been planned earlier. The arrival of Russian naval vessels in Cuba this week

[00:25:39] being seen as a show of force by the Kremlin. President Biden speaking publicly for the first time about his son, Hunter, since the conviction USA's John Schaeffer. With that update, while speaking alongside the Ukrainian president

[00:25:52] at the G7 summit in Italy Thursday, Biden expressed his pride in his son, Hunter. He has overcome an addiction. He is he's one of the brightest, most decent man I know. This marked Biden's first public comments following Hunter Biden's conviction on federal firearm charges.

[00:26:09] He reiterated that he would not pardon his son and addressed earlier questions about possibly commuting a sentence firmly stating no. The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the right to use the abortion pill Mifepristone. The high court unanimously ruled a group of anti-abortion doctors

[00:26:25] lacked the legal standing to challenge the FDA's decision to make Mifepristone more accessible, dismissing the case. This ruling permits the pill to be mailed to patients without requiring an in-person doctor's visit. Former President Trump visiting Washington, D.C. for the first time since he lost the 2020 election.

[00:26:45] Meetings happening Thursday. Trump did a little campaigning when he spoke to reporters. We're a nation that is being left out all over the world. We have a leader that's being left out all over the world. This is USA News.

[00:26:59] The inventor and CEO of MyPillow is always looking for ways to solve everyday problems. Have you ever picked up a towel set because it felt really soft in the store? But then when you go to use it, it's not very absorbent.

[00:27:12] It's basically a towel that's leaving you out to dry. That's why MyPillow has developed the MyPillow towels. Towels that work. I know it's mind blowing towels that actually dry you. The six piece towels that includes two bath towels, two hand towels and two washcloths.

[00:27:27] They come in a variety of colors. And right now you can receive a six piece set for only thirty nine ninety eight with promo code USA. Go to MyPillow.com right now and click on the radio listener special.

[00:27:38] MyPillow products come with a 10 year warranty and they have a 60 day money back guarantee to receive this amazing offer on the six piece set of MyPillow towels. Just go to MyPillow.com. Click on the radio listener special and enter promo code USA

[00:27:53] or call eight hundred nine five one eighty one seventy five. That's MyPillow.com promo code USA. As a parent, is receiving a faith based character focused education for your children difficult to find? Do you believe that godly principles should be a central component in your child's education?

[00:28:11] Imagine a school where faith and integrity are at its center, where heritage and responsibility instill character. For over 40 years, American Heritage School has been educating both hearts and minds, bringing out academic excellence. This is the school where character and embracing the providence

[00:28:28] of a living God are fundamental, where students national test scores average near the 90th percentile. With American Heritage School's advanced distance education program, distance is no longer an issue. With an accredited LDS oriented curriculum from kindergarten through 12th grade, your children can attend from anywhere in the world.

[00:28:47] American Heritage School will prepare your child for more than a job. It will prepare them for life to learn more. Visit American dash heritage dot org. That's American dash heritage dot org. In the medical field, IT security is crucial.

[00:29:03] Our highly skilled consultants are HIPAA certified and have 20 plus years of experience servicing medical clinics, billing and supply companies. We offer comprehensive endpoint protection, guarding your computers and servers against all stages of threats. And with our 24 seven monitoring services, you'll never worry about extensive downtime again.

[00:29:19] Ready to level up your IT support? Call 801 706 6980 today and discover how great IT services can be with managed IT services. Have you ever heard of loving liberty ladies? Well, the loving liberty ladies are here to help you learn our American heritage and the way it affects today's society.

[00:29:38] The loving liberty ladies also have a discussion guide called Proclaim Liberty. And with this guide, you can start your own group in your hometown. Get yours today on our website at loving liberty dot net. Look for our lesson supplements to their free to hear all the special

[00:29:54] offers and to join the fight for freedom and liberty. Please go to loving liberty dot net. All right, ladies and gentlemen, new breaking information as of a couple of hours ago, ruled six to three in the Supreme Court. Bump stocks cannot be banned.

[00:30:22] It looks like Clarence Thomas boldly speaking out and the liberals are absolutely having a conniption doctor. Well, absolutely. See, we were operating off of information that was current yesterday. This morning, real time, this is hot off the presses.

[00:30:36] The Supreme Court has said that these bump stocks cannot be banned, that the that the administration overstepped there. But this is a Trump administration. Remember, it was a six three decision and they were wrong to classify bump stock as a machine gun.

[00:30:51] Alito now has said the real solution is to get rid of the ban on fully automatic weapons. I mean, it's it's really and truly this is kind of drawn a line in the sand and Alito's saying the simple remedy is for Congress

[00:31:06] to amend it. Let's just get rid of it. Of course, Newsom and his crowd are having a stroke over this thing and how it's going to put blood in the streets. And you know, honestly, we could go back to what really precipitated

[00:31:19] this, that incident in Las Vegas in 2017, I believe it was with the guy shooting out of the hotel at the concert. That was not done by a single shot. That was not done by a single shooter. I mean, we had that for sure.

[00:31:34] That proves all kinds of evidence to that fact. There was even people that we had at our event in Vegas just several weeks ago for the CSP, who were speaking out on that saying, look, this is totally bogus. Anyway, all kinds of information about this coming up.

[00:31:48] But look, this is a good news piece. The court rejects that. I'm sure they'll create another false flag and try to shove it down our throats. The court saying, hey, Congress needs to kind of redraft this and that. Congress doesn't have any authority to infringe on your right

[00:32:03] to keep and bear arms either. So the court's lying, even though they've got it right by rejecting the ban, their direction suggesting that Congress can do something about this is a lie, doctor. Well, yeah, I mean, and why I'm chewing my tongue a little bit on it

[00:32:21] is, I mean, here we have this says that the right of the people to keep their arms shall not be infringed. How much more clearly can that be stated? And people say, well, they didn't have automatic weapons. They had weapons that could fire about one round per second

[00:32:35] in the revolutionary period. Now, that's not fully automatic, but but the fact of the matter is those things existed. And by the way, Lewis and Clark carried at least one of those, maybe a couple of them when they went on their big expedition under the Jefferson administration.

[00:32:52] The Native Americans were completely blown away with how fast the cyclical rate was on those things. And they used it to kind of keep the peace and let them know, hey, you know, we all want to be friends. Let's not do anything crazy.

[00:33:06] But the fact of the matter is they weren't just single round load every two minutes kind of thing, even in the American founding era. This stuff, they were that the point, the point, no guns that can equal the government of the day's weaponry

[00:33:22] to stop government from getting out of control. And that's really the bottom line. And so I don't give a rip what they had or didn't have. The point is, the founding fathers understood if the people didn't have the ability to stop the government

[00:33:33] from their evil dictatorial agendas, then we're in trouble. And whatever modern day reality it takes to accomplish that, that's the deal. And Joe Biden literally running around going, yeah, you think you're going to do your M16? I'll fly in my F16. He's even challenging that point.

[00:33:49] In modern day right now. So it's good news, the Supreme Court six to three rejected the ban. Beware of false flags, though, in the wake of this, ladies and gentlemen. And shame on the Donald for allowing this to happen in the first place. Shame on you, Donnie.

[00:34:04] You shouldn't have done it, my friend. And the court even proved it. So there you go. Well, again, we should never have even had to walk down this path. But but it's nice to know that there was a lot of down this path. They did.

[00:34:17] He absolutely should have shut it down as a not doing it. No. But he didn't. He came to the pressure of the political thugs that were around him. And what a sad day that was. But I want to move along, though, to this Trump floats weird idea

[00:34:32] to replace the U.S. income tax. They say it's hard to see how it work. And critics say that it would hurt the poor. Don't you know? We compared to the current tax regime, Jonathan Nicholson with the piece. And basically, it says former President Donald Trump

[00:34:48] on Thursday raised the prospect of scrapping the U.S. income tax system and replacing with something very different, a much higher tariff on imported goods. Now they go on and talk about this. And, you know, they say Trump's been talking about this for a long time.

[00:35:08] But he's ratcheting it up. They say Trump's idea would simply be a return to the past. But then they debunk it and try to claim, oh, it would never fund government. The tariffs that have to be way too high. That it that it up.

[00:35:20] And they go on and try to debunk it every ways. So Sunday, I support this agenda because tariffs are constitutional. State apportionment taxes are constitutional. Indirect taxes are fine. The income tax needs to be scrapped a long time ago. Donald's right about this.

[00:35:34] And most importantly, we don't need to raise as much money as we're spending now through tariffs. What we need to do is raise enough money through tariffs to care for the proper role of limited constitutional government. And the rest needs to be jettisoned anyway.

[00:35:47] So let's go ahead and get rid of the income tax. Let's go ahead and put tariffs and then let's downsize government to match what is realistic on that altar. We could do it right away. Donald, at least speaking out about it,

[00:35:58] he probably won't have the guts to do it, but at least he's talking right for once, doctor. Well, if you read the 45th Federalist paper, I recommend everybody read it at least once a week. You can read that the powers delegated

[00:36:12] to the national government are few and defined, and the others left of the states are numerous. And the fact is that the power to tax to run the thing is basically based upon the import taxes. That was where they were going to get their principal

[00:36:26] ability to fund the government. And I've got good friends that I respect greatly that are very constitutionally minded that today said there's no way that an import tax could support the whatever the federal government devours. But you make a very good point that needs to be re-emphasized.

[00:36:44] And that is we have grown the government way beyond that capability because we have taken unconstitutional paths. And the fact of the matter was the original intent of the founders was to fund the nation basically with the tariffs. Now, here's the deal.

[00:37:00] Now, we could talk all sorts of the abominable tariffs that were put in in the 1820s and how that nearly precipitated the Civil War then in the 1830s and and everything. Tariffs are constitutional, but they must be appropriately and judiciously applied.

[00:37:18] And the authority to do so is found within the Constitution. But what happened back then was that the the northern cabal, if you will, wanted basically to put the the cost of the tariffs on the back of the southern plantation owners, OK,

[00:37:36] those that were producing the goods that were going to be tariffed. And so that caused a real bunch of grief, but they've got to be applied. They need to be uniform. And on top of that, it has another beneficial effect. If in fact.

[00:37:52] Individuals, individuals, I should countries are being tariffed or taxed as they bring goods in the country. You know, let's say China has most favored nation status. They can overrun our country with their cheap slave labor produced products. And we destroy American manufacturers.

[00:38:09] Who makes a shoe in America anymore? Where do we make steel? There's just a handful. We don't make any of the facilities. No. And so what happened is we have we have because of our stupid approach by those.

[00:38:22] I mean, we go back to I mean, Reagan has to bear a lot of this stuff right now with the most favored nation status stuff. But at any rate, China has overrun everything slave labor. They bring it in with we've sold.

[00:38:34] Utah sold its steel making plant out of Geneva steel down in Utah County to China, lock stock and barrel. Every nut and bolt was sold to China to produce steel. We produce I mean, if you think of building a 60 ton tank,

[00:38:49] a battle tank and where do we get our steel? Oh, by golly, we import it. OK, we are. Yeah, we're going to go ahead and fight the communists with the steel that we get for the communists. There you go. That's going to work out really well.

[00:39:01] That's not the problem is, look, for 70 years, they've had this wrong idea about tariffs. Tariffs are like one to two percent of the revenue generated by government. But that's before the income tax system came to abuse us before. Primarily the way they raised money for government was tariffs

[00:39:16] and was apportionment taxes. We need to move back to that. So they mock Trump suggesting that it won't work, but it's really a return to the past. And you would say, well, there's not enough money in modern days to do that through tariffs.

[00:39:27] The tariffs have to be sky high. And my response is that's right. Unless you downsize government to its intended, you know, responsibilities and mandates, or if you want to say delegations of authority, then it's not a problem. It's just the government's grown wrongfully

[00:39:42] because of the abuse of the income tax system to such an extreme level that you're right, you can't make that all up with tariffs only. Right. They've had to find ways to abuse the system and abuse the citizens. So far, we need to go back.

[00:39:56] We need to downsize government to the point where the tariffs could fund government. Now, that's not the piece Trump's talking about, though. And if he doesn't couple the truth, you can't just float an idea without the reality. Number one, I'm floating this idea, ladies and gentlemen,

[00:40:08] because it's the way we used to run government before the income tax system raped the population to the point of, hey, inflation and tariffs, inflation and abuse is so high. We need to downsize government. You say, well, there's not enough money in the tariffs to do it.

[00:40:21] That's right. That's you're right about that. So now it's downsize government to match that reality. If Donald doesn't tell the rest of the story, it'll be a nonstarter doctor. If he tells the rest of the story, he might gain some traction. Well, that is the problem.

[00:40:33] He probably doesn't understand what the rest of the story is. He needs to talk to somebody that does. But the fact of the matter is it this has a double good whammy. We could reduce our dependence upon foreign manufacturers.

[00:40:45] And I just used if we can't get combat boots on our people's feet because we don't make boots here or we can't build our battle tanks. We're in real trouble if it comes to defending the nation.

[00:40:57] And so so that it would say, OK, if if if we raise the tariff, import taxes on on import goods, it will say American manufacturers have at it, maybe we will we will restore to our homeland new economies and Americans will ultimately and finally have more jobs.

[00:41:17] We will have more American products. And when you do that, then the question is how much revenue will there be? So, you know, we need to downsize government. That's beyond doubt. Go ahead and skip the break, would you please? That's beyond a doubt.

[00:41:30] But Trump's idea would simply be returning to the past. Let's be very clear about that, doctor. People don't understand that. But why can't we return to the path? Why can't we downsize government the way it used to be? Get the government's evil abuse off of our backs.

[00:41:42] Why can't we do that? In fact, we can and we should. And the sooner the better would be my response. Well, absolutely. That now people say, oh, yeah, you're going to I mean, you know, we've used the example of the hijacker that hijacked the plane.

[00:41:55] You go in the cockpit and shoot the the bad guy that's piloting the plane in the head and the plane crashes. What you've got to do is regain control of the aircraft, bring it around to a good approach for it, bring it in for a landing.

[00:42:07] And so some of these things, I have really good friends that I respect immensely that want to do things precipitously without any of this regaining control in a reasonable way without turning everything upside down or running. You've got to be smart about that, the doing of this.

[00:42:27] I don't think you can do it tomorrow. You can't just wake up tomorrow and say, hey, we don't have any income tax. We just have tariffs. You've got to slowly but surely let programs sunset. You've got to work on laws that get rid of certain programs.

[00:42:37] You've got to make sure that promises are kept to the best of our ability. And we wean ourselves out of those promises a little bit at a time. An example would be a Social Security scenario where you'd say, hey, those above 65 are just going to get like normal.

[00:42:49] Those 65 to 50 would get, you know, this. You could take a partial payout or you can get this, you know, whatever. And you would back into, hey, those that are under 25 just simply get a refund check and they're off the system entirely.

[00:43:01] And, you know, you could wean your way out of those promises in meaningful, productive, beneficial ways. Everybody's going to have to take a little bit of the hit, but no one's going to take the whole hit kind of a thing.

[00:43:11] You could do it, but you're going to have to be strategic and plan this. First, you got to think about how to win friends, let influence people. And secondly, you got to think like the doctors first do no harm, right? Well, here's here's the deal.

[00:43:23] There's so many things that are very, very, very similar to something the founding fathers had to deal with in the Constitution Convention of 1787. The overwhelming feeling was we got to get rid of slavery. But but Georgia and South Carolina, at least, would never come into it

[00:43:42] because they had under the encouragement of the Brits had mortgaged their farms to the Bank of England and they had brought on slavery. And there's a whole scenario that goes with that. They their farms were mortgage, not the slaves. The slaves were really bad collateral.

[00:43:57] They could get sick and die, run away, whatever refuse to work. So the Bank of England said your farm, we own the mortgage on your farm. So if they turn the slaves loose, suddenly the farm goes bankrupt. The Brits repossessed the farm and suddenly

[00:44:14] Georgia and South Carolina are back in the British fold. So they knew they wanted to get rid of it. They put Article One Section nine in there that says we can't mess with this until night, you know, 20 years later. So they said 1809, we're going to do this.

[00:44:28] And then they could start to wean away from the slavery thing. They had to get the Constitution first before they could get and then they had to get a more perfect union. Gather the people in. They took the next step.

[00:44:43] The next step was get a bill of rights. They had to have a bill of rights. OK, so step by step by step, we marched into this. And there were those that said, I'm throwing this whole constitution away because it doesn't get rid of slavery.

[00:44:56] I mean, I know very senior people in very senior positions, whether it's a church or a government or wherever, that say the Constitution is repugnant to them because it didn't get rid of slavery. We wouldn't have had a Constitution.

[00:45:09] It never would have been ratified if it had been written in there. Then we'll get the Constitution, then we'll get a bill of rights, then we'll get rid of slavery. And there's other thoughts of other things that had to happen in the domino effect, too.

[00:45:22] We couldn't have a money money system until we got the Constitution. You know, everything, there's a there's a time and a season for everything. Go read the scriptures. But the fact is that the Trump has got to understand that this is a phased process.

[00:45:40] He's got to understand how interactive everything is. And a restoration to constitutionally sound government is absolutely essential. And a restoration of the tariffs can occur in concurrent time with that. So I there's a there's a process that has to be gone through.

[00:45:59] And unless people are really willing to think this through, people would do things precipitously that will destroy the whole. And it would make it worse and backfire. Now, it's also important to understand that what you got to do is you got to let constitutional currency gold and silver

[00:46:13] become honest money once again. And you just open it up to competing currencies and let good money drive out bad money over time. There's a lot of little teeny changes that you could make that over time would get us halfway there and wouldn't just take down

[00:46:26] the system or destroy things or backfire against us. You know, it took what, 50 years or 40 years to get the manufacturing gone from the United States or whatever. I mean, I think about it started in the 70s, but Ross Perot

[00:46:38] highlighted how the sucking sound would be like in the 90s. And now we're you know, so it's been a long time in the making. It's going to take a long time to bring our manufacturing back. I expect a five, 10, 15 year time frame just to get that done, doctor.

[00:46:50] Well, there's no question that I mean, you can't just say, oh, we're opening up a steel plant. I had an uncle that during World War Two, he had a an essential job, if you will, during World War Two. He was draft age and everything like that.

[00:47:05] But but he was involved in building the steel plant down on Utah Lake, down in your neck of the woods. And we wanted to a steel plant that couldn't be bombed by foreign powers. And it was far enough inland and all this kind of stuff.

[00:47:19] And he was essential in helping create that. And so he wasn't drafted. That was his military, if you will, duty during World War Two to get a steel plant built there so that we'd be able to build tanks. You can't build them in 90 days. You just can't.

[00:47:36] And we're going to that build back on whether it's building our own shoes or making our own clothing or, I mean, growing our own food. We we import a huge amount of food. We could be independent and stand alone as a nation

[00:47:50] if we chose to be our own independence on look what they've done with the oil and gas production. I mean, they've done everything in their power to break our back on that the coal production. Utah alone has enough coal in it to run our power plants for 300 years.

[00:48:08] I mean, just Utah's coal. I mean, I'm not talking about stuff. And that's not even everything undiscovered stuff, too, though. You discover stuff all the time, too, with new technologies and capabilities and whatever. So that's not even counting that. What could you discover in the next 50 years?

[00:48:21] Much less three hundred and fifty. And so what's happened is there's been a concerted effort to weaken the nation, to offshore everything, to make it so that we can't stand alone. And this is by design. It's so interesting to me that we have been so stupid

[00:48:41] that we have allowed this to happen to ourselves. I want to read you a statement that Thomas Jefferson said, single acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of a day, but a series of oppressions begun at a distinguished period

[00:48:59] and pursued unalterably through every change of ministers to plainly prove a deliberate, systematical plan of reducing us to slavery. OK, now you can take that as a tyrannical kind of thing. And anyway, including the destruction of American independence,

[00:49:16] how we have gutted ourselves, I mean, we are gutting ourselves with our health programs, whether you mandate the jab or whatever, our military is being put in a box with the same sex gender stuff and everything, these these made up sexual status.

[00:49:34] The government is making the military a social club where it's an experiment to reduce our ability to defend our nation. Every single thing. It's not been a single act. It's not an accident of the day. It's a series of things that have been done, pursued unalterably.

[00:49:53] I mean, you look at what Trump did with the bump stocks. Excuse me. And what Biden has now done with the pistol braces, it's it doesn't matter who's in charge. If they're all on the same page, it really matters who's in charge.

[00:50:11] But they have got to keep their actions within the limits and bounds of the Constitution. We need somebody that can restore these things. And it's not somebody at the presidential level. It's at the congressional level. It's at the Senate level. We need people in the courts.

[00:50:27] And honestly, we've been on a real bad curve for a real long time. And Ronald Reagan, as great as everybody thinks he is, he's got blood on his hands, whether it's the vaccine protection act for the manufacturers or the more favored nation status,

[00:50:43] or it's for the amnesty for illegals. I mean, I you just say we put people on on a pillar or some kind of, you know, where that where they're standing up as we are the icon. And really and truly virtually everybody

[00:51:04] we have had in leadership positions has betrayed us. And it's not been an accident. It's been done on purpose. I had a big discussion one day back in the 1990s about the assault weapons ban that went in and my two

[00:51:19] the my congressman, Jim Hanson, the time my senator at the time was Orrin Hatch. And we were just ripping them over the coals for the stupidity of what they put together. And they said, well, we got as good as we could with what?

[00:51:33] No. And I said, no, you didn't get as good as you could. You got as bad as you could and get away with it. You did the worst you could under those scenarios. It'll be worse next time. And that's exactly what they do.

[00:51:45] And for what agenda, fame and fortune, whatever the case may be, there's sellouts and we basically had sellouts for nine to 100 years since 1913. I say nine to 100 because 1913 they passed the Federal Reserve or that fake money deal.

[00:51:59] They passed the income tax, but a lot of it didn't really come to fruition until the 40s. No income tax wasn't really foisted on the people until wartime. Then they said it was a temporary thing.

[00:52:09] And then they and so they just lie, lie, lie and deceive and deceive and betray and betray and betray. We've got to get educated Americans to demand a halt to that con game. And we've got to get people to stand up.

[00:52:20] Trump's right. We need to go back to tariffs. But unless he couples that with a serious downsizing of government and unless he does it strategically in a way that won't do harm first, but that'll do good.

[00:52:30] In other words, you know, hey, let's let's gain control of the plane and find out how to it might be a crash landing and it might not be pleasant for everybody, but let's keep as many people alive or keep the nation alive as we can.

[00:52:39] That's what we've got to focus on. And the only way to do that really in my mind is to turn to God Almighty and repent and then trust the Lord to guide our steps as we bend our course back to constitutional government,

[00:52:52] which would be God, family and country. And until we do that, it isn't going to go well. Doctor, I'm predicting you're going to see the dollar decoupled and you're going to see the the meltdown, you know, happen because there's nowhere for us to go anymore.

[00:53:06] Well, like I say, I mean, Lincoln did virtually everything wrong that could be done, including waging war against the states and seizing the habeas corpus and all those kind of things. The income tax, rights, etc. Here's the 45th Federalist paper that the federal government would have

[00:53:24] authority over foreign commerce, with which last the power of taxation will be for the most part connected. That was the intent when they wrote the when Madison wrote the federalist paper, he said, that's where we're going to get our taxation power.

[00:53:38] So Donald has a real great ability to point to true north. But then when the details start to happen, it falls apart. Or when the real implementation happens, it fails because he doesn't know what he's talking about or what he's doing. He's got to surround himself with true

[00:53:50] constitutional Americans that understand the way back. Yeah. So I encourage Donald Trump to surround himself with true blue constitutionalists in the traditions of our founding fathers. Dr. Scott Bradley might go ahead and head up the ending

[00:54:07] of the Federal Reserve, for instance, you see that kind of stuff, right? We got to get it done, people. Dr. Bradley, thank you so much. Give out your website. Well, as freedoms rising sun dot com, our Bitshoot channel is freedoms

[00:54:20] call, you go to Bitshoot, put in freedoms call. There's probably 400 videos there. You could just look through and see what current events are happening that we've commented on. So anyway, you know, lots of sizing sun dot com Q&A is on the Constitution

[00:54:33] Weekly and more. Check that out. Check out his book to preserve the nation. A collegiate DVD lecture series along with a book for education. We got to get involved. People sideline sports don't work anymore when it comes to saving our republic. But God saved the republic.